2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant diversity on skid trails in oak high forests: A matter of disturbance, micro-environmental conditions or forest age?

Abstract: 29 Increasingly mechanized timber harvesting and the repeated use of skid trail 30 networks may affect ground vegetation differently at subsequent stages in the forest 31 rotation. At a fine scale, no studies have yet compared the influence of 32 micro-environmental factors and the effects of skid trail disturbance on ground flora 33 diversity. We investigated understory diversity patterns on skid trails in 30-, 50-and 34 63-year-old oak forests in the northern half of France. Subplots were placed on skid 35 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following data were recorded for each of the 117 vegetation plots: a track depth (microsite WT), the area of ponded water (%), the area with bare soil (%), heights of planted pine seedlings (if present) and self‐seeded seedlings of pine or other tree species. Finally, the occurrence of species and their cover (at estimated full seasonal development) were recorded according to the Braun‐Blanquet abundance‐dominance classification (as it is described by Wei et al, 2015): i , one individual, the cover <5%; +, very few individuals, the total cover <5%; 1, few to many individuals, the total cover <5%; 2, many individuals, the total cover 5 to 25%; 3, the total cover 25 to 50%; 4, the total cover 50 to 75%; and 5, the total cover >75%. The seven coefficients were later transformed into the following percentile cover values: i , 0.1%; +, 0.5%; 1, 5%; 2, 17.5%; 3, 37.5%; 4, 62.5%; and 5, 87.5% (Wei et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following data were recorded for each of the 117 vegetation plots: a track depth (microsite WT), the area of ponded water (%), the area with bare soil (%), heights of planted pine seedlings (if present) and self‐seeded seedlings of pine or other tree species. Finally, the occurrence of species and their cover (at estimated full seasonal development) were recorded according to the Braun‐Blanquet abundance‐dominance classification (as it is described by Wei et al, 2015): i , one individual, the cover <5%; +, very few individuals, the total cover <5%; 1, few to many individuals, the total cover <5%; 2, many individuals, the total cover 5 to 25%; 3, the total cover 25 to 50%; 4, the total cover 50 to 75%; and 5, the total cover >75%. The seven coefficients were later transformed into the following percentile cover values: i , 0.1%; +, 0.5%; 1, 5%; 2, 17.5%; 3, 37.5%; 4, 62.5%; and 5, 87.5% (Wei et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the occurrence of species and their cover (at estimated full seasonal development) were recorded according to the Braun‐Blanquet abundance‐dominance classification (as it is described by Wei et al, 2015): i , one individual, the cover <5%; +, very few individuals, the total cover <5%; 1, few to many individuals, the total cover <5%; 2, many individuals, the total cover 5 to 25%; 3, the total cover 25 to 50%; 4, the total cover 50 to 75%; and 5, the total cover >75%. The seven coefficients were later transformed into the following percentile cover values: i , 0.1%; +, 0.5%; 1, 5%; 2, 17.5%; 3, 37.5%; 4, 62.5%; and 5, 87.5% (Wei et al, 2015). The species were divided into the following groups: self‐seeded tree seedlings, Ericaceae , graminoides (species with grass‐like morphology), mosses, and other species (Appendix ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to other previous studies [33,34], tree root growth for many plants becomes restricted when soil penetration resistance exceeds 2.00 MPa and stops at resistances greater 3.00 MPa. Many previous studies were agreed that a range of 2.00-3.00 MPa of soil compaction is affecting the pattern of tree growth, but study in oak forests in the northern half of France by Wei et al [35] found the higher soil compaction detected on skid trails, which does not necessarily mean that it will have significant effects on ground flora. This is because flora could survive with penetration resistance to the ground up to 2.5 MPa.…”
Section: Soil Compactionmentioning
confidence: 95%