2022
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2022.0130484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Disease Detection using AI based VGG-16 Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VGG-16 network model was proposed by Simonyan 6 The VGG-16 network structure is very regular, there are not so many hyperparameters, and it focuses on building a simple network. It is a few convolutional layers followed by a pooling layer that can compress the image size, which is totally use 3*3 small convolution kernels and 2*2 maximum pooling layers 7 . The figure2 shows the network structure model of VGG-16.…”
Section: The Vgg-16 Netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VGG-16 network model was proposed by Simonyan 6 The VGG-16 network structure is very regular, there are not so many hyperparameters, and it focuses on building a simple network. It is a few convolutional layers followed by a pooling layer that can compress the image size, which is totally use 3*3 small convolution kernels and 2*2 maximum pooling layers 7 . The figure2 shows the network structure model of VGG-16.…”
Section: The Vgg-16 Netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduced the deep block attention to improve the feature extraction capability of their backbone architecture (i.e., VGG-16). Alatawi et al [32] also utilized a VGG-16 [34] backbone architecture for plant disease classification. They utilized SoftMax and ReLu activation functions along with "Sparse Categorical Cross Entropy Loss" for CNN model training.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 corresponds to the combined confusion matrices for all 38 classes on unseen 12,784 test images. Several other CNN-based classifiers, including DenseNet-201 [21,22], DenseNet-121 [22,25,29,33], ResNet-50 [21,30,33], and VGG-16 [26,32,33] were also trained on the same samples. The confusion matrix of each model was generated and combined, and their corresponding true positive rates were compared with the proposed model; the comparison is shown in Figure 8 We calculate the precision, recall, and F1 score of the proposed PDD-Net, as shown in Table 3, for all 38 classes of the PlantVillage benchmark dataset.…”
Section: Plantvillagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations