2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Density and Nitrogen Supply Affect the Grain-Filling Parameters of Maize Kernels Located in Different Ear Positions

Abstract: Although yield output of maize ( Zea mays L.) has improved markedly over the last century, procedures for improving the grain-filling process remain elusive. Our aim in this study was to relate grain-filling variation in maize (including kernels in apical and middle positions in the ears) to plant density and nitrogen (N) application rate using a crossed experimental design. We also investigated changes in zeatin riboside (ZR), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and gibbere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
40
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(62 reference statements)
6
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Maize grain yield (GY) is determined by the kernel number per unit area (KNA) and the kernel weight (KW). KNA depends on the accumulation of ear biomass around flowering and the biomass using efficiency for kernel setting (Borras and Vitantonio-Mazzini, 2018), while KW relies on the grain filling rate and filling duration (Wei et al, 2019). Consequently, great biomass accumulation around and post silking is of key importance to maize yield improvement (Muchow, 1988; Borras et al, 2004; Ding et al, 2005; Lee and Tollenaar, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maize grain yield (GY) is determined by the kernel number per unit area (KNA) and the kernel weight (KW). KNA depends on the accumulation of ear biomass around flowering and the biomass using efficiency for kernel setting (Borras and Vitantonio-Mazzini, 2018), while KW relies on the grain filling rate and filling duration (Wei et al, 2019). Consequently, great biomass accumulation around and post silking is of key importance to maize yield improvement (Muchow, 1988; Borras et al, 2004; Ding et al, 2005; Lee and Tollenaar, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the interaction effects of density and N rate on maize crops have been widely performed via detailed physiological analyses (Muchow, 1988, Muchow, 1994; Rossini et al, 2011), mainly focusing on response of GY to its components (KNA and KW) or nutrient accumulation and allocation dynamics (Boomsma et al, 2009; Ciampitti and Vyn, 2011; Ciampitti et al, 2013a, Ciampitti et al, 2013b; Wei et al, 2019). To the best of our knowledge, however, there have been no reports of the joint influence of density and N supply on CAP and labeled photosynthate reallocation in maize plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain filling is an important process in determining grain yield that can explain yield changes, which influenced by agricultural management, such as N input and planting density ( Xu et al, 2013 ; Wei et al, 2017 , 2019 ). An appropriate increase in N application could improve the photosynthate supply and matter transport from vegetative to reproductive organs, contributing to the grain-filling rate, grain-filling phase and grain yield under high-density planting conditions ( He et al, 2005 ; Ciampitti and Vyn, 2012 ; Hou et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2015) and Wei et al. (2019) stated that a more intensive plant density results in a decreasing number of kernels per row, a lower number of grains per ear, a lower grain weight per ear, and a lower 1,000‐grain weight, meaning that the grain proportion is reduced. Therefore, increasing plant density changes the ratio of vegetative organs to grains, thus reducing the forage quality (Kong, 2008; Li, 2018; Yu et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%