2017
DOI: 10.1590/1983-21252017v30n315rc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Density and Nitrogen Fertilization on Common Bean Nutrition and Yield

Abstract: -The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of plant densities and sidedressed nitrogen (N) rates on nutrition and productive performance of the common bean cultivars IPR 139 and Pérola. For each cultivar, a randomized complete block experimental design was used in a split-plot arrangement, with three replicates. Plots consisted of three plant densities (5, 7, and 9 plants ha -1 ) and subplots of five N rates (0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha -1 ). Aboveground dry matter, leaf macro-and micronutrient c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
11
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar report revealed increment of total dry biomass with increasing plant population of soya bean up to a certain point and subsequently no addition in biological yield can be obtained thus decrease in economic yield [88]. In line with this, lower plant densities of 5 and 7 plants m-1 resulted in a greater aboveground DM biomass and number of pods per plant of the common bean; grain yield was not decreased [101]. Means in column and row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level of significance.…”
Section: Above Ground Dry Biomass Yield (Kg Ha -1 )supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Similar report revealed increment of total dry biomass with increasing plant population of soya bean up to a certain point and subsequently no addition in biological yield can be obtained thus decrease in economic yield [88]. In line with this, lower plant densities of 5 and 7 plants m-1 resulted in a greater aboveground DM biomass and number of pods per plant of the common bean; grain yield was not decreased [101]. Means in column and row followed by the same letters are not significantly different at 5% level of significance.…”
Section: Above Ground Dry Biomass Yield (Kg Ha -1 )supporting
confidence: 64%
“…As reported by Soratto et al (2017) nutrient uptake may increase seed yield, mainly at lower plant densities. The common bean usually has a great capacity for compensation, that is to occupy empty areas where the number of established plants is lower than the recommended (J. G. Silva & C. C. Silva, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…In a similar study, Amaral et al (2016) observed that N rates (0 kg ha -1 , 40 kg ha -1 , 80 kg ha -1 , 120 kg ha -1 and 160 kg ha -1 ) had an effect on the common bean (IPR Andorinha) yield in succession to corn straw, corn intercropped with U. ruziziensis and U. ruziziensis. The data fitted to a quadratic model, with a maximum grain yield (2,565 kg ha -1 ) obtained with the application of 136 kg ha -1 of N. In common bean in succession to corn intercropped with U. ruziziensis, Soratto et al (2017) found that the supply of topdressing N (0 kg ha -1 , 30 kg ha -1 , 60 kg ha -1 , 120 kg ha -1 and 180 kg ha -1 ) linearly increased the grain yield of the IPR 139 and Pérola cultivars by 17.3 % and 52.2 %, respectively, regardless of the plant density (5 plants m -1 , 7 plants m -1 and 9 plants m -1 ). Thus, although common bean has a relatively short cycle, it can be considered as a great N extractor.…”
Section: Grain Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the grain-filling stage, these reserves are broken, translocated and stored in these organs in the form of proteins and amino acids. In addition, N fertilization, besides promoting increases in yield (Cunha et al 2015, Soratto et al 2017, also stands out in the increase of grain protein content (Silva et al 2006, Farinelli & Lemos 2010, Amaral et al 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%