2012
DOI: 10.1042/bj20111922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant cell walls to ethanol

Abstract: Conversion of plant cell walls to ethanol constitutes second generation bioethanol production. The process consists of several steps: biomass selection/genetic modification, physiochemical pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, fermentation and separation. Ultimately, it is desirable to combine as many of the biochemical steps as possible in a single organism to achieve CBP (consolidated bioprocessing). A commercially ready CBP organism is currently unreported. Production of second generation bioeth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
0
12

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
1
113
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…ABFs are important in efficient and complete degradation of plant cell wall hemicelluloses and pectin and application of ABFs has potential economic and environmental benefits in biorefineries for production of second generation bioethanol (Jordan et al, 2012). The hemicellulose fraction of feed-stock as corn and wheat straw can be highly substituted with Araf ( Fig.…”
Section: Biorefineriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ABFs are important in efficient and complete degradation of plant cell wall hemicelluloses and pectin and application of ABFs has potential economic and environmental benefits in biorefineries for production of second generation bioethanol (Jordan et al, 2012). The hemicellulose fraction of feed-stock as corn and wheat straw can be highly substituted with Araf ( Fig.…”
Section: Biorefineriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current strategies for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks require three major operational steps: physicochemical pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, and fermentation ( Fig. 1) (6,12). Pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis represent substantial cost and it is estimated that the use of cellulolytic microbes for consolidated bioprocessing and eliminating pretreatment would reduce bioprocessing costs by 40% (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in the cellulose becoming obstructed during enzymatic hydrolysis, higher lignin content in the lignocellulosic matrix leading to stronger hydrolysis hindrance. Different approaches to breaking down this matrix are known (chemical, physicochemical, or mechanical treatment 26,27 ), but using catalytic oxidation for this purpose has not been described in literature. as can be seen in Figure 2a.…”
Section: 18mentioning
confidence: 99%