Plant-based meat and dairy substitutes on the Norwegian market: comparing macronutrient content in substitutes with equivalent meat and dairy products

Abstract

Objective: To assess and compare the macronutrient and salt content in meat and dairy substitutes available on the Norwegian market. Design: Comparison between substitute products and two groups of meat and dairy products where one group represented the healthiest option (Keyhole) and one the most used option (Regular). Kruskal–Wallis test with pairwise comparison was conducted on categories with more than two groups, and Mann–Whitney U test was conducted on categories with two groups. Setting: Online stores in Norway. Hundred and two meat substitute products and 173 milk and dairy substitute products on sale spring and autumn 2020 were assessed; additionally, ninety-eight equivalent meat products and 105 milk and dairy products. Results: While Keyhole and Regular meat did not contain fibre, meat substitutes contained 3⋅5–5⋅0 g fibre per 100 g. The saturated fat content in meat substitutes was on average 1⋅9 times lower than in Keyhole products and 5⋅8 times lower than in Regular products. Milk and dairy substitutes contained 3⋅2 and 3⋅4 times less protein than Keyhole and Regular products, respectively. Conclusions: The study results indicate that meat and dairy substitutes on the Norwegian market vary in nutritional composition. Compared to Keyhole and Regular, substitutes contained lower levels of saturated fat, meat substitutes contained higher levels of fibre and milk and dairy substitutes less protein. Future studies should include content of micronutrients for a more comprehensive assessment.

Dietary Habits and Self-Reported Health Measures Among Norwegian Adults Adhering to Plant-Based Diets

“…For meat substitutes, daily consumption was low (2%), across all diet groups. A newly published study found that the nutritionally component of dairy and meat substitutes on the Norwegian market vary ( 24 ). In France, a study found ( 25 ) that vegans and vegetarians had poorer diet quality due to higher intake of ultra-processed foods, which plant-based replacements products are often classified as.…”

Are Vegan Alternatives to Meat Products Healthy? A Study on Nutrients and Main Ingredients of Products Commercialized in Brazil

“…Data collection followed previous studies on modified versions of commercialized products ( 6 , 23 – 25 ). Products from the most significant producers were chosen, covering most of the Brazilian market.…”

“…The per capita global meat intake is projected to be 35 kg/year ( 5 ). Given the expected population growth and increased influx of low and middle-income countries, the global demand for animal-based products would overcome the world's capacity up to 2,050 ( 6 ). On the other hand, people are concerned about the effects of meat-eating on their health and the environment since plant-based diets have been pointed out as one measure to face climate change and non-communicable diseases ( 5 , 7 ).…”

Vegan milk and egg alternatives commercialized in Brazil: A study of the nutritional composition and main ingredients

“…For standardiation and comparison purposes, all values were converted to a serving size of 100 g. According to Brazilian legislation, nutritional labels can be based on food composition tables and present a discrepancy level of 20% (for more or less) between its actual chemical composition and that described on the label ( 38 ). Thus, possible divergences may be present, as evidenced by other studies utilizing food labels as their information source ( 9 , 19 , 37 , 39 , 40 ).…”

“…Data collection was performed according to previous studies ( 9 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 ). The qualitative and quantitative data reported on the products' food labels were recorded, including firm name, brand name, descriptive name, ingredient list, nutrient information, and serving size.…”