2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plans for the future of proton accelerators at CERN

Abstract: The Large Hadron Collider, presently in construction at CERN, will be filled through a set of high performance proton accelerators providing the high brightness beam needed to reach the foreseen luminosity. Although this difficult project has top priority and uses most of the CERN resources, it is nevertheless time investigating improvements of the proton accelerator complex for physical cases beyond the LHC expectations. The needs of multiple physics communities have to be taken into account, as well as the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is improved beam loss control associated with the production of the FT beam in the PS, for which the improvements in beam brightness from the HL-LHC related upgrades combined with a Multi-Turn Extraction approach [20] is a possible solution. A target of 7×10 13 p per SPS cycle has been discussed as a realistic target in the past [21], which seems reasonable as the HL-LHC beams will be closer to 8×10 13 p per (longer) SPS cycle. The beam losses in the SPS during injection, capture and acceleration also needs to be tightly controlled, but these will be overshadowed by the losses associated with the slow extraction process itself.…”
Section: Extraction Types and Limitations For Fixed Target Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is improved beam loss control associated with the production of the FT beam in the PS, for which the improvements in beam brightness from the HL-LHC related upgrades combined with a Multi-Turn Extraction approach [20] is a possible solution. A target of 7×10 13 p per SPS cycle has been discussed as a realistic target in the past [21], which seems reasonable as the HL-LHC beams will be closer to 8×10 13 p per (longer) SPS cycle. The beam losses in the SPS during injection, capture and acceleration also needs to be tightly controlled, but these will be overshadowed by the losses associated with the slow extraction process itself.…”
Section: Extraction Types and Limitations For Fixed Target Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to naive expectation, a multi-megawatt booster is not necessary for the construction of a Beta Beam or a nuclear physics (EURISOL-like [16]) facility and could be fully exploited only by a low-energy neutrino SuperBeam [17] or by a Neutrino Factory complex. Any of the possibilities currently under discussion at CERN [18,19] for the upgrade of the PSB based either on Rapid Cycling Syncrotrons or on Linacs represents a viable solution for the production stage of a Beta Beam complex. They would allow production of ∼ 2×10 13 6 He/s for 200 kW on target, consistently with the current SPL-based design.…”
Section: The Accelerator Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternatives that profit of the upgrade of the LHC injection system are also mentioned (upper part). RCS stands for Rapid Cycling Syncrotron, RSS for Rapid Superconducting Syncrotron [19]. Other abbreviations are defined in the text.…”
Section: Far Detector Concept and Expected Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase of the Beta Beam energy [2] could be envisaged by a fast cycling superconducting SPS ("Super-SPS") at CERN. This machine is currently considered as an option for the luminosity upgrade and, possibly, the energy upgrade of the LHC [3]. In this case, the detector mass could be significantly reduced and the baseline would match the CERN-LNGS distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%