Abstract:In recent years, serosurveillance has gained momentum as a way of determining disease transmission and immunity in populations, particularly with respect to vaccine-preventable diseases. At the end of 2017, the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit and the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology held a meeting in Vietnam with national policy makers, researchers, and international experts to discuss current seroepidemiologic projects in Vietnam and future needs and plans for nationwide serosurveillanc… Show more
“…The idea of using serology-based methods to measure the presence of pathogen-specific antibodies in populations of interest and define the level of exposure and infectious disease landscape is rapidly gaining traction [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. It is increasingly seen as a powerful tool that could complement classical case-based disease surveillance, generate a wealth of information and help guide public health policy.…”
Section: Serology To Assess Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing bespoke sero-surveillance studies, where a population is screened for the presence of antibodies of interest, is often time-, labor- and cost-intensive [ 19 ]. Thankfully, antibodies can be detected in serum, DBS and saliva using only a small volume of fresh or frozen sample, and therefore serology can be performed on convenience samples, such as residual serum from hospital laboratories [ 37 ], blood banks [ 38 , 39 ] and historical collections [ 23 , 40 ].…”
Section: Serology To Assess Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, proper sample preservation is crucial to guaranteeing scientific validity of the results, and a rigorous ethical framework must be in place to ensure that consent for further testing of the samples has been received [ 20 ]. As illustrated in Vietnam, a hybrid sample collection approach combining the expansion of existing studies with convenience sampling can also be adopted to balance biases inherent to each collection technique [ 19 ].…”
Section: Serology To Assess Disease Burdenmentioning
Understanding the local burden and epidemiology of infectious diseases is crucial to guide public health policy and prioritize interventions. Typically, infectious disease surveillance relies on capturing clinical cases within a healthcare system, classifying cases by etiology and enumerating cases over a period of time. Disease burden is often then extrapolated to the general population. Serology (i.e., examining serum for the presence of pathogen-specific antibodies) has long been used to inform about individuals past exposure and immunity to specific pathogens. However, it has been underutilized as a tool to evaluate the infectious disease burden landscape at the population level and guide public health decisions. In this review, we outline how serology provides a powerful tool to complement case-based surveillance for determining disease burden and epidemiology of infectious diseases, highlighting its benefits and limitations. We describe the current serology-based technologies and illustrate their use with examples from both the pre- and post- COVID-19-pandemic context. In particular, we review the challenges to and opportunities in implementing serological surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which bear the brunt of the global infectious disease burden. Finally, we discuss the relevance of serology data for public health decision-making and describe scenarios in which this data could be used, either independently or in conjunction with case-based surveillance. We conclude that public health systems would greatly benefit from the inclusion of serology to supplement and strengthen existing case-based infectious disease surveillance strategies.
“…The idea of using serology-based methods to measure the presence of pathogen-specific antibodies in populations of interest and define the level of exposure and infectious disease landscape is rapidly gaining traction [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. It is increasingly seen as a powerful tool that could complement classical case-based disease surveillance, generate a wealth of information and help guide public health policy.…”
Section: Serology To Assess Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing bespoke sero-surveillance studies, where a population is screened for the presence of antibodies of interest, is often time-, labor- and cost-intensive [ 19 ]. Thankfully, antibodies can be detected in serum, DBS and saliva using only a small volume of fresh or frozen sample, and therefore serology can be performed on convenience samples, such as residual serum from hospital laboratories [ 37 ], blood banks [ 38 , 39 ] and historical collections [ 23 , 40 ].…”
Section: Serology To Assess Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these cases, proper sample preservation is crucial to guaranteeing scientific validity of the results, and a rigorous ethical framework must be in place to ensure that consent for further testing of the samples has been received [ 20 ]. As illustrated in Vietnam, a hybrid sample collection approach combining the expansion of existing studies with convenience sampling can also be adopted to balance biases inherent to each collection technique [ 19 ].…”
Section: Serology To Assess Disease Burdenmentioning
Understanding the local burden and epidemiology of infectious diseases is crucial to guide public health policy and prioritize interventions. Typically, infectious disease surveillance relies on capturing clinical cases within a healthcare system, classifying cases by etiology and enumerating cases over a period of time. Disease burden is often then extrapolated to the general population. Serology (i.e., examining serum for the presence of pathogen-specific antibodies) has long been used to inform about individuals past exposure and immunity to specific pathogens. However, it has been underutilized as a tool to evaluate the infectious disease burden landscape at the population level and guide public health decisions. In this review, we outline how serology provides a powerful tool to complement case-based surveillance for determining disease burden and epidemiology of infectious diseases, highlighting its benefits and limitations. We describe the current serology-based technologies and illustrate their use with examples from both the pre- and post- COVID-19-pandemic context. In particular, we review the challenges to and opportunities in implementing serological surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which bear the brunt of the global infectious disease burden. Finally, we discuss the relevance of serology data for public health decision-making and describe scenarios in which this data could be used, either independently or in conjunction with case-based surveillance. We conclude that public health systems would greatly benefit from the inclusion of serology to supplement and strengthen existing case-based infectious disease surveillance strategies.
“…Country ownership based on locally accepted practices and public health priorities should be the foundation of the design and implementation of the serosurveys, while biomarkers for specific pathogens and use-cases would need to be validated at the regional or international levels. Based on experiences from countries in implementing the initial integrated serosurveillance systems (for example, pilot projects in Cambodia [ 19 ], Kenya [ 20 ], Nigeria [ 21 ], and Vietnam [ 22 ]), generic models could be created that countries could adapt to their national priorities and needs. This could include standard guidelines, operating procedures, training modules, as well as a network of technicians in LMICs that could fix and calibrate multiplex machines when needed, and would create a global avenue for interplatform collaboration and exchange of experiences and practices ( Box 1 ).…”
Author summary
The use of biomarkers to measure immune responses in serum is crucial for understanding population-level exposure and susceptibility to human pathogens. Advances in sample collection, multiplex testing, and computational modeling are transforming serosurveillance into a powerful tool for public health program design and response to infectious threats. In July 2018, 70 scientists from 16 countries met to perform a landscape analysis of approaches that support an integrated serosurveillance platform, including the consideration of issues for successful implementation. Here, we summarize the group’s insights and proposed roadmap for implementation, including objectives, technical requirements, ethical issues, logistical considerations, and monitoring and evaluation.
We document factors that influenced integrating surveillance functions for vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) and other communicable diseases in the Western Pacific Region (WPR).n Barriers included insufficient coordination within the public and private sectors, inadequate engagement of national Expanded Program on Immunization programs, lack of surveillance and laboratory capacity, inability to link epidemiologic and laboratory data, and suboptimal scope and design of surveillance systems for achieving control and elimination goals.n Best practices and innovations included developing guidelines for integrated VPD surveillance, standardizing processes for laboratory surveillance and testing of multiple VPDs, using multiplex testing for multiple diseases, and conducting joint epidemiology and laboratory surveillance data review meetings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.