2006
DOI: 10.1017/s1471068406002717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning with preferences using logic programming

Abstract: We present a declarative language, PP, for the high-level specification of preferences between possible solutions (or trajectories) of a planning problem. This novel language allows users to elegantly express non-trivial, multi-dimensional preferences and priorities over such preferences. The semantics of PP allows the identification of most preferred trajectories for a given goal. We also provide an answer set programming implementation of planning problems with PP preferences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our immediate goal for the future is to investigate the scalability and efficiency of the proposed method. The use of answer set programming allows us to easily incorporate preferences or domain knowledge in the generation of the joint plans [22,23]. Additionally, we would like to explore the use of more expressive languages (e.g., action languages with constraints and sensing actions) in representing and reasoning about joint-plans of multiagents by addressing various questions mentioned in [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our immediate goal for the future is to investigate the scalability and efficiency of the proposed method. The use of answer set programming allows us to easily incorporate preferences or domain knowledge in the generation of the joint plans [22,23]. Additionally, we would like to explore the use of more expressive languages (e.g., action languages with constraints and sensing actions) in representing and reasoning about joint-plans of multiagents by addressing various questions mentioned in [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Son and Pontelli [7] propose a language for specifying preferences in planning that distinguishes three types of preferences: basic, atomic, and general preferences. A basic preference is originally expressed by a propositional formula using Boolean as well as temporal connectives.…”
Section: Each Optimization Directive '#Optimize(s)' Is Represented Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…#minimize statements or weak constraints [2,3]). On the other hand, such quantitative ways of optimization are often insufficient for applications and in stark contrast to the vast literature on qualitative and hybrid means of optimization [4][5][6][7][8]8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such formalism allows to specify, to reason and to generated preferred plans. This approach generalizes the one proposed in (Son & Pontelli, 2006), which also uses temporal logic for expressing preferences over executing plans with an implementation using answer-set programming. At the best of our knowledge, there are no work treating qualitative conditional preferences elicitation and reasoning over sequence of attributed objects in the lines of the CP-Net formalism.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%