Planning wetland protection and restoration for the safeguard of ecosystem service flows to beneficiaries

Goyette, Jean-Olivier; Cimon-Morin, Jérôme; Mendes, Poliana; Thériault, Maxime; Pellerin, Stéphanie; Poulin, Monique

doi:10.1007/s10980-021-01267-x

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This kind of relationship tends to appear in some regulation services related to hazards (e.g., flood regulation, prevention of avalanches, local climate regulation or erosion regulation). For example, wetland protection and restoration can facilitate flood attenuation (Goyette et al, 2021). The flow direction of energy-based ES is usually controlled by natural forces.…”

Section: Energy Flow and Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comprehensive framework for quantifying ecosystem service flow focusing on social-ecological processes

Wang

Zheng³

et al. 2023

Transactions in Earth, Environment, and Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecosystem service flow refers to the whole process of ecosystem service production, delivery and utilization, which is closely related to social-ecological processes. However, quantifying the entire ecosystem service flow process remains challenging, placing limits on the management of social-ecological systems to improve human wellbeing. Here, we explored the relationship between social-ecological processes (e.g., product transfer, matter cycling, energy flow and information delivery) and the spatial flow of ecosystem service. Then, we reviewed methods quantifying the spatial flow of ecosystem service. Finally, we proposed a comprehensive framework for quantifying the whole process of ecosystem service flow in terms of social-ecological processes. The framework consists of the quantification of ecosystem service supply and demand, the spatial flow of ecosystem service between suppliers and consumers, and the quantification of utilized ecosystem service. To better quantify the whole process of ecosystem service flow, we need to further understand the factors impacting ecosystem service flow, develop process-based models integrating beneficiaries and infrastructure, and establish social-ecological approaches to inform ecosystem service flow governance.

show abstract

Section: Energy Flow and Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comprehensive framework for quantifying ecosystem service flow focusing on social-ecological processes

Wang

Zheng³

et al. 2023

Transactions in Earth, Environment, and Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Restoration costs include opportunity costs, direct costs, contingency costs, transaction costs, external costs, and time lags (Wang et al, 2021a). Previous studies have used various indicators to represent monetary restoration costs, such as anthropogenic pressure (Qu et al, 2019;Goyette et al, 2021) and ecological restoration feasibility (Orsi and Geneletti, 2010). Considering that the available data on costs are often limited (Wang et al, 2022), we built a conceptual model for estimating restoration costs, which can be expressed by the following equation:…”

Section: Quantification Of Restoration Costsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the regional context of the degree of coordination between ES supply and demand serves as another important basis for guiding restoration action (Shi et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2021a). However, only a few studies have addressed the mitigation of regional ES supply and demand mismatches as an essential target of restoration planning (Costa et al, 2021;Goyette et al, 2021). A recent study by Costa et al (2021) proved that ES demand should be integrated into forest landscape restoration to enhance local human well-being.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, Costa et al (2021) did not examine the changes in restoration costs when improving the representativeness of ES demand in the priority area network. To the best of our knowledge, approaches for optimizing the allocation of restoration resources that simultaneously combine the status of regional ES supplydemand (mis)matches and restoration costs remain rare (Goyette et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Identifying priority areas for tidal wetland restoration by integrating ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches

Shu

et al. 2022

Front. Mar. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governments and non-governmental organizations have widely recognized tidal wetland restoration as a sustainable instrument to lessen the threat of climate change, which is reflected by the expansion of the spatial scale of coastal restoration projects. However, approaches to large-scale spatial planning of tidal wetland restoration remain sparse. Previous studies on site selection for restoration planning have focused on the potential supply of ecosystem services (ES) or restoration feasibility with less emphasis on the mitigation of the status of regional ES supply and demand mismatches. We developed a five-step workflow based on systematic conservation planning to identify priority areas for tidal wetland restoration and applied it to the coastal reclaimed areas of Shanghai, China. With this workflow, we analyzed the changes in spatial distribution and the potential ecosystem services supply and restoration costs of priority areas between the two different scenarios of ES demand ignored and ES demand considered. Results showed that the potential restorable areas only accounted for 31.4% (425.2 km²) of the original reclaimed area because of other land use demands (e.g., permanent basic farmland conservation). We extracted 50% of the potential restorable areas as priority areas based on Aichi Target 15. Compared with the ES demand-ignored scenario, the ES demand scenario resulted in a substantial increase in the priority areas of Baoshan District (~177%) and Pudong New Area (~15%) and a small decrease in Chongming District (~4%). No significant change in the potential ES supply for all priority areas was observed between the two scenarios. However, the total restoration cost of the ES demand scenario is 10% higher than that of the ES demand-ignored scenario. Our study highlights the importance of considering the status of regional ES supply and demand (mis)matches in large-scale spatial planning for tidal wetland restoration.

show abstract

Application of Estuarine and Coastal Classifications in Marine Spatial Management

Pittman,

Swanborn,

Connor

et al. 2024

Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science (Second Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Planning wetland protection and restoration for the safeguard of ecosystem service flows to beneficiaries

Cited by 7 publications

References 58 publications

A comprehensive framework for quantifying ecosystem service flow focusing on social-ecological processes

A comprehensive framework for quantifying ecosystem service flow focusing on social-ecological processes

Identifying priority areas for tidal wetland restoration by integrating ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches

Application of Estuarine and Coastal Classifications in Marine Spatial Management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About