Planning virtual residency interviews as a result of COVID-19: insight from residency applicants and physicians conducting interviews

Abstract

BackgroundIn response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020–2021 residency interview process will undergo significant changes. Residency programme stakeholders would benefit from knowledge on what students and physicians expect from this process.ObjectiveThe purpose of the study was to describe and contrast the perspectives of student applicants and interviewing physicians related to the residency programme virtual interview process.MethodsA survey consisting of 24 Likert statements was administered across listservs in summer 2020 to physicians (attendings and residents who interview medical students). Medical students also received an anonymous survey and were recruited via email to participate.ResultsA total of 155 individuals (104 fourth-year medical students and 51 physicians) completed a survey. Results showed students would prefer in-person interviews over virtual. Residency applicants had high agreement on the limited ability to fully assess the programme and city due to virtual interviews. Individuals with lower step 1 scores had higher agreement on preferring in-person interviews. Individuals in the lowest and highest scoring groups appear more worried about the representation of themselves as a result of virtual interviews. Furthermore, applicants feel that more weight will be placed on steps 1 and 2 scores and class ranks, and they may not be able to fully demonstrate their personality compared with interviewers.ConclusionThe result of COVID-19 has created challenges and subsequent reshuffling of medical education requiring careful preparation and planning. This study provides insight for residency programmes to better understand the applicants’ expectations for the 2020–2021 residency interview and matching process.

Virtual obstetrics and gynecology fellowship interviews during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a survey study

“…Several studies have examined the complete transition to virtual interviews during the pandemic for training programs from a variety of medical specialties [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. As remote interviews may become commonplace following resolution of the pandemic, it is important to evaluate both programs' and applicants' perspectives on using virtual platforms.…”

Advocating for a New Residency Application Process: A Student Perspective

“…Applicants’ priorities include assessing a program's culture, often through informal interactions, in addition to presenting themselves in the best light possible, which some feel is hampered by the virtual format. 6 , 22 , 23 Likewise, some programs have expressed dismay at the difficulty in assessing an applicant's “fit” and surgical aptitude. 24 , 25 - 26 …”

Psychological Benefits and Challenges of Ph.D. Entrance Exam Virtual Interviews During COVID-19 Pandemic: Does Gender Play a Role?

“…Gender differences did not significantly impact the applicants’ perceptions, as was also the case in Baker et al (2020) and Seifi et al (2020) . But Shreffler et al (2021) found that male and female applicants differed regarding their responses to some survey statements. At the time of this study, 75% of our participants did not have any prior experience with VI.…”

“…The same changes in interview processes for recruitment purposes occurred in other educational sects, especially medical education, which was highly impacted by the pandemic ( Bhardwaj et al, 2021 ) including recruiting medical students for residency ( Davis et al, 2020 ; Foong, 2020 ; Shreffler et al, 2021 ), surgical training ( Day et al, 2020 ; McKinley et al, 2020 ), and emergence medicine ( Deiorio et al, 2019 ). The United States health care is dramatically impacted by the pandemic ( Patel et al, 2020 ).…”