2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning the European power sector transformation: The REmap modelling framework and its insights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on an analysis of the renewable energy roadmap programme prepared by the International Renewable Energy Agency, valuable findings for the European power sector development were presented by Collins et al [47]. The possibility of meeting 50% of the gross electricity demand in the EU-28 from RES by 2030 and reducing CO 2 emissions by 43% in the power sector, compared to the 2005 level, was confirmed.…”
Section: Deployment Of Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an analysis of the renewable energy roadmap programme prepared by the International Renewable Energy Agency, valuable findings for the European power sector development were presented by Collins et al [47]. The possibility of meeting 50% of the gross electricity demand in the EU-28 from RES by 2030 and reducing CO 2 emissions by 43% in the power sector, compared to the 2005 level, was confirmed.…”
Section: Deployment Of Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following four cases were simulated for the chosen scenario: (i) with 4.92% loss factor on the GB-Norway link, (ii) without any loss on the link, (iii) hurdle cost of 4.0 e/MWh on imports and exports, and (iv) hurdle cost of 2.5 e/MWh on flows from GB to Norway and 2.9 e/MWh between Norway and GB, respectively. The choice of 4.0 e/MWh in case iii) is taken from [16] where the authors have used this hurdle cost for all interconnectors in their model. The asymmetric hurdle costs used in case iv) are derived by considering the loss factor and average price in each market with detailed explanation provided in Appendix A. for the four cases while Table III reports the average marginal prices in GB and Norway, GB imports, GB exports and utilisation of the link.…”
Section: Impact Of Modelling Hvdc Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of the REmap methodology to the energy sector of various countries (see Sgouridis et al, 2016 for the United Arab Emirates, Collins et al, 2018 for the European Union) and comparisons of its results with more complex and dedicated energy models have yielded key insights (see Kempener et al, 2015 for comparison with the national IEA-ETSAP models) where the methodology is found suitable for engaging experts and policy makers in the assessment and For this analysis, we narrowed down the geographical scope to countries of the G20 (excluding the European Union), but extended the time scope to 2050 by using the 2030 regional renewable energy roadmap prepared for the G20 as a starting point (IRENA, 2016d;2017d). 3 G20 countries represent more than three-quarters of the current total installed fossil fuel-based electricity generation capacity and an equal share of the renewable energy deployment potential in the energy sector (G20, 2015).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Electricity Generation Capacity MIX Using mentioning
confidence: 99%