2011
DOI: 10.5204/intjfyhe.v2i2.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning sustainable peer learning programs: An application and reflection

Abstract: A Peer Learning Framework was proposed at the University of Tasmania (UTAS) to foster a coherent approach to peer learning programs and to guide the effective design and planning of new initiatives (Skalicky & Brown, 2009). A planning tool was constructed within a theoretical framework underpinned by a community of practice model (Lave & Wenger, 1991). The framework is examined through its application to a program which offers student-facilitated drop-in learning skills support. The framework's community of pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing upon the research that has examined peer to peer programs (Adam, Skalicky, & Brown, 2011;Biggs, 2003;Ramsden, 1992;Topping, 1996) and following accepted practice in Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) programs as a guide, a pilot Let's Chat program was designed incorporating student facilitators to be employed casually at the Higher Education Worker (HEW) Level 3. Twenty positions were advertised.…”
Section: The Development Of a Conversational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing upon the research that has examined peer to peer programs (Adam, Skalicky, & Brown, 2011;Biggs, 2003;Ramsden, 1992;Topping, 1996) and following accepted practice in Peer Assisted Learning (PAL) programs as a guide, a pilot Let's Chat program was designed incorporating student facilitators to be employed casually at the Higher Education Worker (HEW) Level 3. Twenty positions were advertised.…”
Section: The Development Of a Conversational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have found that traditional didactic lectures were not the most effective approach for learning 1,2 . Other studies have found that small‐group learning that included active self‐directed participation increased students’ confidence, self‐autonomy, and ownership in learning, 3‐7 interpersonal skills, 8 communication, 5,8 problem‐solving, 8,9 and critical thinking 8 . These enhanced outcomes appeared to be associated with increased involvement of students in the educational process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Studies have found that, with this methodology, students’ knowledge was reinforced, their confidence grew, and their communication skills improved 4,14‐17 . Peer‐assisted learning can be conducted in many ways, including but not limited to informal peer‐established study groups, tutoring, and formal mentoring 6,14 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Many implementations of peer learning are not solely targeted at achieving specific learning outcomes but simultaneously strive to enhance the overall university experience. 18 Success on both fronts has been measured using a variety of qualitative methods, as well as quantitative indicators such as grades, grade point average, retention, and graduation rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%