Applications of Artificial Intelligence I 1984
DOI: 10.1117/12.943182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning Strategic Paths Through Variable Terrain Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies have considered both deterministic and stochastic situations and have derived methods based on, for example, potential fields [4], graph search methods [5] and evolutionary algorithms [6], [7], [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have considered both deterministic and stochastic situations and have derived methods based on, for example, potential fields [4], graph search methods [5] and evolutionary algorithms [6], [7], [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common algorithms for autonomous path planning are methods such as potential fields [3], graph search methods [4,5], and Evolutionary Algorithmic (EA) techniques [6,7]. Of these the EA-based methods seem well suited for dynamic environments as they can deal with uncertainty in location, however they tend to be somewhat inefficient.…”
Section: Navigation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rowe and Ross 1990) discussed another way to find optimal paths for the problem we are considering, apportioning the terrain into a uniform grid of elevation values and doing a "wavefront propagation" of costs in an ever-expanding area about a start point. But there are many disadvantages to this approach (Mitchell and Keirsey 1984;Rowe and Richbourg 1990). Section 8 will show that such an approach gives ugly solution paths hard to follow in the real world, and requires significantly more computational effort and storage than our methods in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%