2007
DOI: 10.1177/1473095207077587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning rules for a self-planned city

Abstract: Planning theory, laws, and systems are essentially procedural in that they focus on the process of planning and decision-making but do not deal with the substance of the decisions nor their impact on cities. They emphasize the role of the many (f)actors that shape the built environment rather than the resultant properties of the built environment itself. This is true both for the rational comprehensive theory of the 1960s and the 1990s postmodern theory of communicative planning theory. In this article we clai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alexander, 1977;Alfasi and Portugali, 2007;Duarte, 2011;Lynn, 1998;Novak, 2001). In self-organizing approaches, the spatial configuration or plan/design emerges within a process based on dynamic, autonomous, and adaptive ''computation'' and relationships between urban entities, defining for example tolerable proximity, use or volume of adjacent buildings.…”
Section: Complexity Planning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Alexander, 1977;Alfasi and Portugali, 2007;Duarte, 2011;Lynn, 1998;Novak, 2001). In self-organizing approaches, the spatial configuration or plan/design emerges within a process based on dynamic, autonomous, and adaptive ''computation'' and relationships between urban entities, defining for example tolerable proximity, use or volume of adjacent buildings.…”
Section: Complexity Planning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Complex systems such as cities show emergent properties and non-linear relationships between components, making them highly intractable and difficult to predict. Planning theory has in recent years started to recognize and tackle this challenge, whether from the point of view of conceptualizing coherent urban form (Salingaros 2000), articulating planning processes (Healey 1997), relating social theory, self-organization and planning rules (Portugali 1999, Alfasi andPortugali 2007), analyzing and simulating complex urban structures (Batty 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many initiatives which include ideas that could contribute to an area's potential might thus not be realized within existing sets of planning rules, since they are derived in terms of 'being' and insufficiently account for 'becoming'. In contrast, loose rules do not try to cover all possible urban forms, nor do they advocate any particular way of living (for a similar discussion see Alfasi & Portugali, 2007). Loose rules guide future development paths and embrace diversity in further evolution rather than regarding it as a risk to be minimized.…”
Section: ! 17!mentioning
confidence: 99%