The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.2172/1332539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning for a Distributed Disruption: Innovative Practices for Incorporating Distributed Solar into Utility Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been found even when treated as spill-overs between regions, that is, when neighboring regions do influence each other throughout the adoption process [13,14,15]. As Mills et al [16] correctly pointed out, researchers and policymakers need to improve their understanding of non-monetary adoption factors in order to better incorporate solar systems in to utility planning, thus focusing on potential policy shortfalls in supporting the adoption of PV for late-comers.…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivessupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results have been found even when treated as spill-overs between regions, that is, when neighboring regions do influence each other throughout the adoption process [13,14,15]. As Mills et al [16] correctly pointed out, researchers and policymakers need to improve their understanding of non-monetary adoption factors in order to better incorporate solar systems in to utility planning, thus focusing on potential policy shortfalls in supporting the adoption of PV for late-comers.…”
Section: Introduction and Objectivessupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Finally, our methodologies provide a better understanding of profile adopters and adoption patterns within areas at the bottom of their adoption curve [16]. These results are important for making it easier for utilities and policymakers to address potential needs within the power grid system, especially as community solar is bound to expand further, and social interactions increase in importance [34] for successfully transitioning towards a low-carbon electricity generation.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Research: Defining The Right Policiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The dGen model mitigates such variability in the sampling of weight, roof area suitable to DPV deployment, and annual load by an agent-mutation mechanism that scales these attributes in aggregate across all agents per county and sector to known totals. 4 Though the scaling ensures central tendencies are reflected, it removes heterogeneity in these attributes at the county level. Alternatively, at sufficiently high agent resolutions, the distribution in roof area suitable to DPV deployment and annual load across all agents in a county will more closely resemble the true population distribution of each sector and county.…”
Section: Figure 1 Instantiation Workflow For Key Stochastically Sampmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods differ widely in the algorithms and input data used, though they can generally be classified as either top-down or bottom-up. Top-down models use central tendencies to project aggregate deployment, notable examples include time series models [4,5] and econometric models [6][7][8][9][10]. Bass Models are perhaps the most widely used adoption models [5 -11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various T&D planning studies are beginning to address this issue. Although they apply a range of approaches to perform such analyses, all come to the same conclusion; results are primarily driven by the detailed conditions of particular distribution feeders (Mills et al, 2016). Furthermore, it is unclear if the investment in EE by a customer on the same distribution feeder with a PV system or even by one without a PV system will have an exacerbating or mitigating effect on the need for additional T&D investment.…”
Section: Impacts On Utility Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%