2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2019.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning coordinated motions for tethered planar mobile robots

Abstract: This paper considers the motion planning problem for multiple tethered planar mobile robots. Each robot is attached to a fixed base by a flexible cable. Since the robots share a common workspace, the interactions amongst the robots, cables, and obstacles pose significant difficulties for planning. Previous works have studied the problem of detecting whether a target cable configuration is intersecting (or entangled). Here, we are interested in the motion planning problem: how to plan and coordinate the robot m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure that we use for detecting path crossings (described in Section 2.2) is adapted from this work. (Zhang & Pham, 2019) consider the same problem as (Hert & Lumelsky, 1994), but the workspace may contain obstacles and there is no objective function to optimize: they simply search for a valid schedule such that robots do not cross cables. To avoid crossings, precedence constraints and waiting times are introduced, and a precedence graph is used to detect deadlocks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure that we use for detecting path crossings (described in Section 2.2) is adapted from this work. (Zhang & Pham, 2019) consider the same problem as (Hert & Lumelsky, 1994), but the workspace may contain obstacles and there is no objective function to optimize: they simply search for a valid schedule such that robots do not cross cables. To avoid crossings, precedence constraints and waiting times are introduced, and a precedence graph is used to detect deadlocks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(a), the blue path is closer to the triangle than the red path whereas the red path is closer to the rectangle than the blue path. Given two paths that share a same obstacle vertex, we can decide in constant time which one is the closer to the obstacle, as described in (Zhang & Pham, 2019). This may be extended to the case of two paths that share some sub-path, by ensuring that paths never cross.…”
Section: Detecting Deadlocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This algorithm could obtain localized feedback and adjust the motion error from the AprilTags [6] on the ground. Since concrete needs to be pumped through a pipe, Zhang and Pham [7] designed an algorithm that included four different modes to solve the motion planning problem for multiple tethered planar mobile robots. Similar to [4], Lv et al [8] proposed a holonomic mobile printing method by switching the workspace and used the contour of the printed object to estimate the pose of the mobile platform and update the mobile platform control.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a hydrodynamics and control model to simulate a tethered underwater robot system is presented in [21]. A motion planning algorithm for multiple tethered planar mobile robots, emphasizing entanglement avoidance, is proposed in [22]. An approach for cooperative manipulation of a cablesuspended load with two aerial robots is presented in [23].…”
Section: B Motion Planning Considering Tethered Cablesmentioning
confidence: 99%