1987
DOI: 10.1002/int.4550020204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning and reasoning for autonomous vehicle control

Abstract: A reasoning system to support the planning and control requirements of an autonomous land vehicle is described. This system is designed specifically to handle diverse terrain with maximal speed, efficacy, and versatility. The hierarchical architecture for this system is presented along with the detailed algorithms, heuristics, and planning methodologies for the component modules. The architecture is structured such that lower-level modules perform tasks requiring greatest immediacy, while higher-level modules … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency condition guarantees that the solution converges to the true one as the grid is refined. This is known not to be the case in general graph search algorithms that suffer from digitization bias due to the metrication error when implemented on a grid (Mitchell et al, 1987;Kiryati and Székely, 1993). This gives a clear advantage to our method over minimal path estimation using graph search.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The consistency condition guarantees that the solution converges to the true one as the grid is refined. This is known not to be the case in general graph search algorithms that suffer from digitization bias due to the metrication error when implemented on a grid (Mitchell et al, 1987;Kiryati and Székely, 1993). This gives a clear advantage to our method over minimal path estimation using graph search.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The standard algorithm for finding optimal paths on terrain with a known cost map is a dynamicprogramming "wavefront propagation" (Chavez and Meystel 1984;Graglia and Meystel 1987;Parodi 1985;Witkowski 1983;Mitchell et al 1987). (Note that path-finding methods that search a visibility graph of region vertices (Lozano-Perez and Wesley 1979) apply to terrain with only obstacles, not regions of varying cost; and methods that designate "good" areas of free space (Brooks 1983;Crowley 1984;Rueb and Wong 1987) do not give optimal paths.)…”
Section: Wavefront-propagation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixth, although this is rarely recognized, wavefront-propagation algorithms are incapable even in principle of obtaining optimal solutions in the limit when the number of grid cells modeling some fixed terrain area approaches infinity, because of the "digital bias" effect (Mitchell et al 1987), that solution paths not following the "natural" directions of the grid tend to be longer than necessary because of the "zigzagging". To illustrate, consider a starting point inside a forest and a goal point in a field adjacent the forest.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations