2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40899-016-0062-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning and implementing small dam removals: lessons learned from dam removals across the eastern United States

Abstract: We review and build on a growing literature assessing small dam removal outcomes to inform future dam removal planning. Small dams that have exceeded their expected duration of operation and are no longer being maintained are at risk of breach. The past two decades have seen a number of small dam removals, though many removals remain unstudied and poorly documented. We summarize socio-economic and biophysical lessons learned during the past two decades of accelerated activity regarding small dam removals throu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates of need will only increase over time, as federal funding for dam rehabilitation is currently not appropriated (ASCE, ). Given these very large ranges likely due to regional and project level factors (Tonitto & Riha, ; Whitelaw & MacMullan, ), our goal with these estimates is not to provide absolute certainty in rates and costs of future removal but to highlight the magnitude of trends, their economic relevance given other estimates of dam safety need, and make a case for more systematic data collection to refine our understanding and future projections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates of need will only increase over time, as federal funding for dam rehabilitation is currently not appropriated (ASCE, ). Given these very large ranges likely due to regional and project level factors (Tonitto & Riha, ; Whitelaw & MacMullan, ), our goal with these estimates is not to provide absolute certainty in rates and costs of future removal but to highlight the magnitude of trends, their economic relevance given other estimates of dam safety need, and make a case for more systematic data collection to refine our understanding and future projections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the question of how do the anoxic conditions influence the fate and release of P associated with millpond and streambank sediments? Moreover, dams are increasingly being removed across the mid-Atlantic and elsewhere [66][67][68][69]. An important question that is on the mind of many watershed managers and environmental agencies is how does the removal of the dams influence particulate and dissolved fractions of P stored upstream of the dams in the stream channel and along the banks?…”
Section: Conceptual Model For Source/sink Behavior Of Legacy Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full restoration of species richness and densities, however, may take longer [21], and the macroinvertebrate community in the Boardman River will likely continue to shift as the stream habitat changes over the long term. Dams limit biota through impeding migration and altering habitat [5]. Such limitations and alterations are eliminated with dam removal.…”
Section: The Brown Bridge Dam Removal As a Unique Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dams alter the downstream flow of nutrients, sediment, and organic matter, and limit macroinvertebrate drift [2,3]. Dams also create barriers to movement of aquatic organisms to upstream habitats, an effect most detrimental to fish populations, particularly diadromous fish species, because dams block these species' essential reproductive migrations and stop movement of juveniles to habitats required for optimal feeding and growth [4,5]. Additionally, dams reduce lateral connectivity in floodplain habitats and alter floodplain function by eliminating flooding [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%