Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781119171386.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning and Designing Useful Evaluations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another result of the study is about curriculum selected to evaluate. Five main question should be ansvered in the process of selectin curriculum to evaluate [21] Where is the program in its development? When the theses were analyzed in terms of evaluated curricula, it is seen that primary school curricula restructered in 2005 were evaluated mostly between these dates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another result of the study is about curriculum selected to evaluate. Five main question should be ansvered in the process of selectin curriculum to evaluate [21] Where is the program in its development? When the theses were analyzed in terms of evaluated curricula, it is seen that primary school curricula restructered in 2005 were evaluated mostly between these dates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders of curricula also want to know whether their curriculum is performing properly or not [21]. In Turkey, curriculum evaluation studies are generally carried out in two different ways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite "the various benefits of play [being] beyond doubt" (Hännikainen, et al 2013 p. 165), the current UK Government continues to fail to commit to a "clear policy on children's play" (Play England, 2011a), and play provision in England continues to be hit hard as a result of the austerity measures (Jozwiak, 2014;McKendrick et al in the introduction to this collection; Play England, 2011b). The failure to capitalise upon the opportunity to provide a strong evidencebased case for national play investment is all the more important if, as Newcomer et al (2010) contend, decisions can be influenced when credible evaluation findings are communicated to funders, and policy and programme managers.…”
Section: However What Transpired For This Nationwide Programme Delivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The funding guidance stated "… you [the local authority] are in charge of the [self-evaluation] process and we would not normally ask to see any report" (BLF, 2006, p.16). It is widely accepted that making such unaccountable recommendations for evaluation is problematic (Newcomer et al, 2010;Quinn-Patton 2008;Radhakrishna and Relado, 2009;Taylor et al, 2005). Understanding how programme managers view evaluation influences the way in which evaluation is undertaken and the way in which the findings are used, which ultimately impacts on the utility of the evaluation process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the program evaluation, despite the different positions and approaches, there are key elements that describe it: the dynamic nature of the evaluation, the scientific process, the collection of valid and reliable information, the decision-making, the contextualized nature; being referred to a program; having an ideological and political function and enabling an assessment of what it has evaluated (Colás & Rebollo, 1993;Newcomer, Hatry & Wholey, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%