1962
DOI: 10.2307/1484745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planktonic Foraminiferal Species in Pacific Sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
167
1
6

Year Published

1971
1971
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
7
167
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Chamber addition continued in steps until all chambers were added. G. ruber typically adds between 15 and 17 chambers (Parker, 1962), so a terminal chamber count of 16 was used in all models (Table 2).…”
Section: A2 Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chamber addition continued in steps until all chambers were added. G. ruber typically adds between 15 and 17 chambers (Parker, 1962), so a terminal chamber count of 16 was used in all models (Table 2).…”
Section: A2 Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraminifera were least abundant at sites 722 and 758 where one-half to all of the specimens were picked for analysis. Individual specimens were identified to species level, generally following the taxonomy of Parker (1962Parker ( , 1967 and Blow (1969) with modifications (Dowsett and Robinson, 2007), and glued to a 60-square micropaleontological slide. 709, 716, 722, 754, 757, 758, and 763 described in this study and mean mid-Piacenzian planktic foraminifer species distribution at those sites.…”
Section: Micropaleontological Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total there are 16 343 modern specimens: 15 355 macroperforate and 988 microperforate (Table 2). Buckley mainly used the taxonomy of Parker (1962) and was able to identify 33 morphospecies in the collection, which are well spread throughout the phylogeny of planktonic foraminifera and cover all recognized ecogroups (Aze et al 2011).…”
Section: Slide Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%