2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/643278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planktonic Foraminiferal Biostratigraphy and Correlation Across the Cretaceous-Paleogene Transition at the Tethyan and the Atlantic Realms

Abstract: Based on high-resolution planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphical analysis at El Kef stratotype section (GSSP for the K/Pg boundary), Ellès section in Tunisia, and Agost and Caravaca sections in Spain (Tethyan realm), we attempt to compare biozones and subzones with those of the Bidart section (SW France) (Atlantic realm). The Abathomphalus mayaroensis zone of the upper Maastrichtian corresponds to the taxon range interval of the nominate species. We have identified the Plummerita hantkeninoides subzone. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the dispute among KPB specialists focused on the controversy over the causes of the extinction, the debate on the presence of "reworked specimens vs. survivor taxa" in lowermost Danian samples waned in the 2000s, and virtually nothing else was published in the 2010s, with only a few exceptions (e.g., Gallala et al 2009;Gallala 2013Gallala , 2014Punekar et al 2014;Molina 2015). However, this is a relevant issue both for the verification or refutation of the two main hypotheses about the causes of the KPB extinction (asteroid impact vs. massive volcanism) and for the reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships among early Danian planktic foraminifera (e.g., Koutsoukos 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the dispute among KPB specialists focused on the controversy over the causes of the extinction, the debate on the presence of "reworked specimens vs. survivor taxa" in lowermost Danian samples waned in the 2000s, and virtually nothing else was published in the 2010s, with only a few exceptions (e.g., Gallala et al 2009;Gallala 2013Gallala , 2014Punekar et al 2014;Molina 2015). However, this is a relevant issue both for the verification or refutation of the two main hypotheses about the causes of the KPB extinction (asteroid impact vs. massive volcanism) and for the reconstruction of the phylogenetic relationships among early Danian planktic foraminifera (e.g., Koutsoukos 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%