1985
DOI: 10.2307/1940394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planktivore Prey Selection: The Reactive Field Volume Model vs. the Apparent Size Model

Abstract: Two models proposed to explain prey selection by visually foraging planktivorous fish, the reactive field volume model (RFVM) and the apparent size model (ASM), have been found to yield similar dietary predictions in many situations. However, we found earlier formulations of the ASM to be incorrect. The correct predictions of these two models were compared. Published empirical data from an earlier fish foraging study were reanalyzed and found to fit both models quite well. Interpretation of data from an unpubl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in the size frequency of prey selected using RC or AC foraging strategies at all prey densities when reactive distance and visual distance were equal. Wetterer & Bishop (1985) reported similar results while comparing prey selection between the RFVM a n d the ASM. However, for prey distance distribution, a s the prey density increased, the difference between RC and AC increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were no differences in the size frequency of prey selected using RC or AC foraging strategies at all prey densities when reactive distance and visual distance were equal. Wetterer & Bishop (1985) reported similar results while comparing prey selection between the RFVM a n d the ASM. However, for prey distance distribution, a s the prey density increased, the difference between RC and AC increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Our results also indicated that when the reactive distance was below the visual distance, there were differences in sizes of prey selected between random and largest A C . Wetterer & Bishop (1985) reported a similar result for brook stickleback Culaea inconstans when reactive distances were not directly proportional to prey length.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wetterer & Bishop 1985, Bence & Murdoch 1986 but no firm conclusion about general processes has yet been reached. It has become clear, however, that selection cannot be described by the RFVM alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If fish behavioral toxicology is to advance in this manner, toxicologists must make better use of the ecological literature already available on the mechanisms and strategies employed by foraging fishes (e.g., Werner 1974;Vinyard 1980;Gardner 1981;Luecke and 0' Brien 1981;Mittelbach 1981Mittelbach ,1983Bartell 1982;Eggers 1982;O' Brien et al 1976O' Brien et al ,1985O' Brien et al ,1989O' Brien et al ,1990Wetterer and Bishop 1985;Evans and 0' Brien 1988;Wanzenbock and Schiemer 1989;. A clear understanding of normal fish foraging behavior, coupled with more ecologically realistic laboratory experimental designs, will provide the necessary framework within which toxicologists may identify toxicant effects on fish foraging behavior and growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%