2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-50297-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planktic Foraminifers in the Modern Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

23
442
5
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(526 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
23
442
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson and Bé (1978) and Anderson and Lee (1991) both describe the main organelles and features observed in foraminiferal cells (e.g., nuclei, ribosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, lysosomes and digestive vacuoles, peroxisomes, mitochondria, fibrillar bodies, cytoskeletal structures) but the source of all their TEM images except for one was planktonic foraminifera or LBF. Hemleben et al (1989) and Schiebel and Hemleben (2017) thoroughly described the cytology of planktonic foraminifera.…”
Section: Brief History Of Foraminiferal Tem Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson and Bé (1978) and Anderson and Lee (1991) both describe the main organelles and features observed in foraminiferal cells (e.g., nuclei, ribosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, lysosomes and digestive vacuoles, peroxisomes, mitochondria, fibrillar bodies, cytoskeletal structures) but the source of all their TEM images except for one was planktonic foraminifera or LBF. Hemleben et al (1989) and Schiebel and Hemleben (2017) thoroughly described the cytology of planktonic foraminifera.…”
Section: Brief History Of Foraminiferal Tem Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G. sacculifer -it makes up less than 5% of the planktic foraminiferal assemblage around the LBB today (Siccha and Kučera, 2017) -is abundant in the Caribbean Sea and tropical Atlantic and commonly used as a tracer of tropical waters and geographical shifts of the ITCZ (Poore et al, 2003;Vautravers et al, 2007). Also, G. ruber (pink) shows rather coherent abundance maxima in the tropics (between 20°N and 20°S), while no such affinity is observed for G. ruber (white) and G. conglobatus (Siccha and Kučera, 2017;Schiebel and Hemleben, 2017). Therefore, fluctuations in relative 260 abundances of G. sacculifer and G. ruber (pink) are referred here as to represent a warm tropical end-member (Fig.…”
Section: Early Mis 5ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test morphology and chemical composition to a certain extent depend on the environment (Schiebel et al, 2017;de Nooijer et al, 2014). The 5 calcification process of the foraminiferal test is the phase of growth in which the elemental and isotopic compositions of the test is determined, and is also the key generating their morphological diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%