2010
DOI: 10.2514/1.45921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planform and Camber Effects on the Aerodynamics of Low-Reynolds-Number Wings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 [8] indicates the parameters in the camber line design. Based on previous studies [5][6][7][8], a positive camber of 5.8%…”
Section: A Geometry Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 [8] indicates the parameters in the camber line design. Based on previous studies [5][6][7][8], a positive camber of 5.8%…”
Section: A Geometry Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, there were no particular reasons provided to explain this phenomenon. Swanson and Isaac [5] studied planform and camber effects on low-Reynolds-number aerodynamics computationally. An extremely low Reynolds number of 500 was investigated, and they showed that the tip vortex is the dominant flow, and it forms the highly three-dimensional (3-D) low-velocity region at high incidences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the incidence increases, flow separation, transition, and reattachment appear, which affect strongly the flow structure, and hence the lifting surface performance. Lian and Shyy [2] and Swanson and Isaac [3] indicated that transition can occur for Re c ≥ 10 4 , and therefore a transition model is required in this flow condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kim et al [17] conducted threedimensional unsteady simulation of a blowfly's forward flight, and unveiled the role of three-dimensional vortical structure in unsteady aerodynamic force generation. Swanson and Isaac [18] investigated planform and camber effects on unsteady aerodynamics of three-dimensional wing in constant freestream at various angles of attack and low Reynolds number. Four types of wings were simulated to identify dominant flow features around each wing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%