2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.03053
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetesimal/Debris discs

Abstract: This review chapter for young researchers presents our current understanding of debris discs. It introduces some of their basic properties and observables, and describes how we think they form and collisionally evolve. Special emphasis is dedicated to ALMA observations of the dust and gas, which constrains the distribution of planetesimals, their volatile composition, and potential volatile delivery to planetary atmospheres.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a 0 and the full width at half maximum of the radial profile, we find a fractional width (FWHM/a 0 ) of 0.52. Even though the almost edge-on inclination is not ideal to constrain the width of the disk, this is in good agreement with other disks observed with ALMA (median width of 0.74, Marino 2021Marino , 2022. When summing the total flux in the best-fit model for the ALMA observations, we derive a total flux of 23.4 ± 0.3 mJy, compatible with the value reported in Cataldi et al (2020, 22.0 ± 2 mJy).…”
Section: Disk Geometrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…From a 0 and the full width at half maximum of the radial profile, we find a fractional width (FWHM/a 0 ) of 0.52. Even though the almost edge-on inclination is not ideal to constrain the width of the disk, this is in good agreement with other disks observed with ALMA (median width of 0.74, Marino 2021Marino , 2022. When summing the total flux in the best-fit model for the ALMA observations, we derive a total flux of 23.4 ± 0.3 mJy, compatible with the value reported in Cataldi et al (2020, 22.0 ± 2 mJy).…”
Section: Disk Geometrysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Since the rings of 2M041240 have low optical depth (see Section 4.1), the rapid formation of large grains that have negligible contributions to millimeter fluxes serves as a plausible explanation. Given the similar radial scale to cold ExoKuiper belts in debris disks, these dust rings might also be progenitors of old debris rings sustained by the collision of planetesimals formed within these high-density regions (Marino 2022;Najita et al 2022). On the contrary, those bright disks with inner cavities that depart from the main population, especially those few around low-mass hosts (M * < 1 M e ) that drive the M * − L mm relation, might be outliers where grain growth was inhibited within pressure bumps, if somehow grains did not fragment efficiently inside the pressure bumps due to the dust properties (such as composition) or because bouncing stops the effective growth.…”
Section: Context With Other Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the collisional cascade, high velocity collisions gradually grind down larger solids into smaller solids, which are ejected from the system by stellar radiation pressure (e.g., Wyatt 2008;Kobayashi & Löhne 2014;Matthews et al 2014;Kobayashi et al 2019;Marino 2022). In the standard kinetic model, the evolution time for the cascade is roughly equivalent to the time required for a collision between the two largest particles in the swarm, which depends on the distance from the central star, the radius r max of the largest solid involved in the cascade, and the mass in solids with radii  r r max (e.g., Wyatt & Dent 2002;Dominik & Decin 2003;Krivov et al 2008;Wyatt 2008;Kenyon & Bromley 2017;Krivov & Wyatt 2021).…”
Section: Predicted Ir Excesses and Observational Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%