2015
DOI: 10.1051/eas/1571023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary Nebulae: What Can They Tell Us About Close Binary Evolution?

Abstract: Abstract. It is now clear that a binary pathway is responsible for a significant fraction of planetary nebulae, and the continually increasing sample of known central binaries means that we are now in a position to begin to use these systems to further our understanding of binary evolution. Binary central stars of planetary nebulae are key laboratories in understanding the formation processes of a wide-range of astrophysical phenomena -a point well-illustrated by the fact that the only known double-degenerate,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The notion that binary stellar systems (e.g, Bond & Livio 1990;Bond 2000;Zijlstra 2015) or planetary systems (e.g, De Marco & Soker 2011) shape planetary nebulae (PNe) has gained a huge support over the years, both from theoretical considerations that point to the difficulties of models based on single asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stellar progenitors to shape PNe (e.g., Soker & Harpaz 1992;Nordhaus & Blackman 2006;García-Segura et al 2014), and from a large number of observations and their analysis (e.g., from 2015 on, Akras et al 2015;Aller et al 2015a,b;Boffin 2015;Corradi et al 2015;Decin et al 2015;Douchin et al 2015;Fang et al 2015;Gorlova et al 2015;Hillwig et al 2015;Jones 2015;Jones et al 2015;Martínez González et al 2015;Miszalski et al 2015;Močnik et al 2015;Montez et al 2015;Jones et al 2016;Chiotellis et al 2016;Akras et al 2016;García-Rojas et al 2016;Jones 2016;Hillwig et al 2016a,b;Bond et al 2016;Chen et al 2016;Madappatt et al 2016;Ali et al 2016;Hillwig et al 2017). In most cases of shaping by binary interaction, jets are involved (e.g., Morris 1987;Soker 1990;Sahai & Trauger 1998;Boffin et al 2012;Huarte-Espinosa et al...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that binary stellar systems (e.g, Bond & Livio 1990;Bond 2000;Zijlstra 2015) or planetary systems (e.g, De Marco & Soker 2011) shape planetary nebulae (PNe) has gained a huge support over the years, both from theoretical considerations that point to the difficulties of models based on single asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stellar progenitors to shape PNe (e.g., Soker & Harpaz 1992;Nordhaus & Blackman 2006;García-Segura et al 2014), and from a large number of observations and their analysis (e.g., from 2015 on, Akras et al 2015;Aller et al 2015a,b;Boffin 2015;Corradi et al 2015;Decin et al 2015;Douchin et al 2015;Fang et al 2015;Gorlova et al 2015;Hillwig et al 2015;Jones 2015;Jones et al 2015;Martínez González et al 2015;Miszalski et al 2015;Močnik et al 2015;Montez et al 2015;Jones et al 2016;Chiotellis et al 2016;Akras et al 2016;García-Rojas et al 2016;Jones 2016;Hillwig et al 2016a,b;Bond et al 2016;Chen et al 2016;Madappatt et al 2016;Ali et al 2016;Hillwig et al 2017). In most cases of shaping by binary interaction, jets are involved (e.g., Morris 1987;Soker 1990;Sahai & Trauger 1998;Boffin et al 2012;Huarte-Espinosa et al...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† E-mail: brent@saao.ac.za because of new theoretical advances complemented by direct and growing evidence for binarity in PNe . Almost 50 close binaries are now known, with the majority exhibiting orbital periods of 1 d or less (Miszalski et al 2011a;Jones 2015). The short orbital periods are the result of at least one common-envelope (CE) phase (Paczynski 1976;Ivanova et al 2013) and together they represent the youngest accessible window into the aftermath of this critical and unobserved phase of binary stellar evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the formation and shaping of most PNe is a result of binary evolution (e.g., see review [12]), then the majority of CSPNe should have binary companions. Searches for such companions have been made using photometric (and radial velocity) variability over many decades starting with the early work by [19] that revealed companions in 10-15% of a sample of ∼100 CSPNe with periods, P < ∼ 3 d. Recent searches have now considerably increased the sample size-with a dearth of objects at long periods (P > 3 d, [20][21][22]). The small period (thus small orbital separation) of the binaries suggests that these objects must have undergone common-envelope (CE) evolution at an earlier phase of their evolution.…”
Section: Binary Companions and Disks In Post-agb And Post-rgb Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%