1984
DOI: 10.1029/ja089ia05p02708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary Mach cones: Theory and observation

Abstract: This study uses observations by a number of spacecraft to investigate the asymptotic behavior of planetary bow shocks. Toward this end a single standard method has been used to model distant bow shock position and shape. Mach cone angles of 13.9±2°, 11.4±3°, and 8.1±4° at Venus, Earth, and Mars, respectively, were determined from the observational shock models. These cone angles and their decrease with growing distance from the sun are consistent with downstream bow shock position being limited by the MHD fast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These works concluded that the shock location depends on the solar cycle and solar EUV flux, the upstream solar wind parameters, and the orientation of the IMF (see also Phillips and McComas 1991 (Martinecz, et al 2008) Figure 5a shows Martinecz et al (2008) VEX BS and IMB fits and in Figure 5b a comparison with other shock models based on other data sets at solar minimum. The VEX BS fit is in good agreement with the model of Slavin et al (1984) based on Mariner 5,10 and Venera 4, 6, 9, 10 observations. During solar minimum, a comparison between the BS position and solar EUV flux (F50 index: 0.1 -50 nm integrated photons cm −2 s −1 and shifted to Venus) derived from SOHO SEM observations shows no apparent dependence (Martinecz et al 2008).…”
Section: Venussupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These works concluded that the shock location depends on the solar cycle and solar EUV flux, the upstream solar wind parameters, and the orientation of the IMF (see also Phillips and McComas 1991 (Martinecz, et al 2008) Figure 5a shows Martinecz et al (2008) VEX BS and IMB fits and in Figure 5b a comparison with other shock models based on other data sets at solar minimum. The VEX BS fit is in good agreement with the model of Slavin et al (1984) based on Mariner 5,10 and Venera 4, 6, 9, 10 observations. During solar minimum, a comparison between the BS position and solar EUV flux (F50 index: 0.1 -50 nm integrated photons cm −2 s −1 and shifted to Venus) derived from SOHO SEM observations shows no apparent dependence (Martinecz et al 2008).…”
Section: Venussupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Similar differences between the planets are also seen in the ratio of proton inertia length to bow shock size, but the proton inertia length at Mars (few hundred km) is still very small compared to the Martian bow shock size (∼5000 km). The Mach numbers (Alfvén and Fast Magnetosonic) are similar among these three planets, varying only by a factor of ∼1.4 between Venus and Mars (Slavin et al, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A rough comparison of the solar wind plasma parameters (their ratios) among the regions near Venus, the Earth, and Mars is listed in Table 1, in which we adopt the Alfvén Mach number (M A ) from Slavin et al (1984) and a constant solar wind speed between Venus and Mars (Smith and Wolfe, 1979). The Venus-Earth difference in the bow shock size is due to the intrinsic dipole magnetic field that exists only at the Earth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…incorrect asymptotic behavior unless distant crossings are included (Slavin et al, 1984), and do not consider specific heat ratio influence on the planetary bow shock position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%