2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary ENA imaging: Effects of different interaction models for Mars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As comparison to the measurements shown in Figure 9d, Figure 10 shows the predictions for solar wind ENAs of a model from Gunell et al (2006), and Figure 11 shows the predictions for planetary ENAs of the model from Lichtenegger et al (2002), which has to be compared to Figure 9a. The ENA image shown in Figure 10 has been calculated for the observation configuration of the ENA measurements shown in Figure 9d.…”
Section: Flux Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As comparison to the measurements shown in Figure 9d, Figure 10 shows the predictions for solar wind ENAs of a model from Gunell et al (2006), and Figure 11 shows the predictions for planetary ENAs of the model from Lichtenegger et al (2002), which has to be compared to Figure 9a. The ENA image shown in Figure 10 has been calculated for the observation configuration of the ENA measurements shown in Figure 9d.…”
Section: Flux Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ENA image shown in Figure 10 has been calculated for the observation configuration of the ENA measurements shown in Figure 9d. In the published version (Gunell et al, 2006) Figure 10. Model of solar wind ENA intensities (Gunell et al, 2006) that has been adapted to the NPD measurement conditions in Figure 9d.…”
Section: Flux Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fortunately, previous observations and simulations showed that the majority of dayside ENAs are emitted near the dayside IMB (∼0.2 R M altitude) [Kallio et al, 1997;Gunell et al, 2006a;Futaana et al, 2006b] where the neutral density is the highest (lowest altitude) and the proton flux is still significant (protons do not penetrate the IMB). Some simulations showed that the most intense source region locates between the bow shock and the IMB, from the subsolar point to a SZA of ∼ 75 • [Kallio et al, 1997;Mura et al, 2002;Holmström and Kallio, 2004;Gunell et al, 2006b]. With this knowledge, we define the source position of the ENAs as (1) the intersection (P1) of its corresponding LOS (LOS1) and the IMB, if they intersect, or (2) the point of the closest approach (P2) of the LOS (LOS2) to the center of Mars, if the LOS and the IMB do not intersect ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Statistical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%