1973
DOI: 10.1016/0019-1035(73)90139-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary brightness temperature measurements at 8.6 mm and 3.1 mm wavelengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an ideal radiometer, the combination of sky temperature and typical measurement signals will not compress the amplifiers. However, calibration sources are typically much warmer than the CMB and so compression can have important consequences when deriving responsivities from astronomical or other sources (for example, the Moon is ∼223 K; Ulich et al 1973). For the Q-band array, responsivity measurements in the laboratory and at the site with different calibration sources were all consistent with each other, confirming that the modules were not operating in a compressed regime.…”
Section: Responsivitiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For an ideal radiometer, the combination of sky temperature and typical measurement signals will not compress the amplifiers. However, calibration sources are typically much warmer than the CMB and so compression can have important consequences when deriving responsivities from astronomical or other sources (for example, the Moon is ∼223 K; Ulich et al 1973). For the Q-band array, responsivity measurements in the laboratory and at the site with different calibration sources were all consistent with each other, confirming that the modules were not operating in a compressed regime.…”
Section: Responsivitiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The emission from the ∼0. • 5 Moon varies across its face (Ulich et al 1973); polarized responsivities for a single detector could vary between the brightest and darkest portions of the Moon's face by 20% (worst case 50%). Ultimately this meant we could not use the Moon to calibrate the responsivities for the W-band receiver as we could with the Q-band receiver or we would have misestimated our responsivity (and hence our noise) by at least 20%.…”
Section: Responsivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. (1986), Rather, Ulich & Ade (1974), Ulich & Conklin (1976), Ulich (1974), Ulich, Cogdell & Davis (1973) and Whitcomb et. al.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This may be achieved by the calibration of any offsets in the nominal values of the geometric-calibration parameters discussed below. A more detailed discussion of the reference systems and the attitude analysis may be found in van Leeuwen et al (2002) and Harrison & van Leeuwen (2005).…”
Section: P O I N T I N G R E C O N S T Ru C T I O Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation