Abstract:This paper explores the geographical distribution of independent and do‐it‐yourself information and communication technology maintenance and repair (INDIY ICT M&R) activity around the world. It examines a large set of Google Analytics data pertaining to users of free, open‐source online repair manuals provided by iFixit, a US‐based organisation that develops the free manuals, sells tools and components, and also engages in technical education and policy advocacy. The paper draws on three years of available use… Show more
“…We further supplemented the more detailed information from Youtube repair videos by consulting repair guides for relevant models of smartphones and tablets available from iFixit. iFixit is a wiki-based site devoted to posting free repair instructions covering more than 13,000 devices in some dozen languages (Lepawsky, 2020). Combining information from the Youtube results and relevant iFixit manuals about specific repair steps, tools, intermediate materials, and components enabled us to add detail to our LCA analyses not otherwise available in existing LCA databases or literature (see the description of LCA later and Sections S1-S6 of Supporting Information S1).…”
To what extent do repair and maintenance of consumer electronics conserve the materials and energy they embody? In this paper we examine the conservation value of a cluster of independent third-party electronics repair businesses in Lima, Peru. Drawing on a combination of methods that include fieldwork, digital methods for online sociology, and life cycle assessment (LCA) of phones and tablets we quantify the conservation value of typical repairs performed at businesses in this cluster in terms of CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e) and water consumption relative to new manufactures of the same categories of electronics. We model typical repair scenarios and find that repair can offer substantial conservation benefits. However, these benefits vary by device sub-unit repaired (e.g., replacing a camera vs. replacing a display). For example, while two screen repairs through replacement is nearly equivalent to replacement with a whole new device, repairing with components that are already in the market could save around 10% of total emissions in global warming potential (GWP) for both devices. Further, we discuss the politics of attributing the conservation value achieved by the third-party repair cluster in Lima to either domestic (that is, Peruvian) or foreign CO 2 e and water consumption. Whose conservation of CO 2 e and water is this? How do the answers to that question shape understandings of the relevance of location for industrial ecology? Our work contributes to the emerging subfield of political industrial ecology and its incorporation of spatially explicit LCAs.
“…We further supplemented the more detailed information from Youtube repair videos by consulting repair guides for relevant models of smartphones and tablets available from iFixit. iFixit is a wiki-based site devoted to posting free repair instructions covering more than 13,000 devices in some dozen languages (Lepawsky, 2020). Combining information from the Youtube results and relevant iFixit manuals about specific repair steps, tools, intermediate materials, and components enabled us to add detail to our LCA analyses not otherwise available in existing LCA databases or literature (see the description of LCA later and Sections S1-S6 of Supporting Information S1).…”
To what extent do repair and maintenance of consumer electronics conserve the materials and energy they embody? In this paper we examine the conservation value of a cluster of independent third-party electronics repair businesses in Lima, Peru. Drawing on a combination of methods that include fieldwork, digital methods for online sociology, and life cycle assessment (LCA) of phones and tablets we quantify the conservation value of typical repairs performed at businesses in this cluster in terms of CO 2 equivalent (CO 2 e) and water consumption relative to new manufactures of the same categories of electronics. We model typical repair scenarios and find that repair can offer substantial conservation benefits. However, these benefits vary by device sub-unit repaired (e.g., replacing a camera vs. replacing a display). For example, while two screen repairs through replacement is nearly equivalent to replacement with a whole new device, repairing with components that are already in the market could save around 10% of total emissions in global warming potential (GWP) for both devices. Further, we discuss the politics of attributing the conservation value achieved by the third-party repair cluster in Lima to either domestic (that is, Peruvian) or foreign CO 2 e and water consumption. Whose conservation of CO 2 e and water is this? How do the answers to that question shape understandings of the relevance of location for industrial ecology? Our work contributes to the emerging subfield of political industrial ecology and its incorporation of spatially explicit LCAs.
“…The mental aspects of repair are related to a new way of thinking to get away from overconsumption; they involve creativity and cultivating values such as care, upgrade, repurposing, and appreciation [5,8]. Researchers discuss the gender issues of repair, in which the technological aspects of repair are associated with males and care with females [33]. The researchers note that an important social function of repair is the development of local communities, solidarity through participation in repair cafes, and other events [28].…”
Repair is recognized as an important part of the circular economy and leads to fewer resources being used, less waste, and less emissions generation. The crucial condition for scaling repairs is people’s perception of repairs as a significant social practice harmonizing the relationship between society and nature. This paper aims to analyze the key discourses of repair in the content of the posts of the biggest Russian online communities and to identify environmental discourse. These communities specialize in the repair of household appliances, IT, and telecommunications equipment and are organized by independent repairers. We collected all of the posts from the communities that contain textual information in the body of the post. Based on the analysis of the results of the theoretical discourses of repair, we identified four types of repair discourses: environmental, pedagogical, social, and the discourse of the right to repair. We formed lists of keywords corresponding to each discourse type and analyzed posts by computer processing. We concluded that the practice of repair is widespread in specialized online communities, but the content of these communities includes almost no mention of environmental discourse. Social and pedagogical discourses prevail. Based on our research results, we suggested some recommendations for greening and spreading repair.
“…Documenting ICT maintenance and repair at anything other than coarse scales of national or subnational regions is a challenge due to differing jurisdictional definitions of repair as an economic activity and what sectors of the economy are aggregated together to count that activity [24,47]. Using a novel dataset Lepawsky has recently demonstrated the global extent of independent and do-ityourself ICT maintenance and repair activity (INDIY ICT M&R) [22]. His results show that INDIY ICT M&R involves a growing population of people numbering in the millions of individuals who are ubiquitously, but unevenly, distributed around the world.…”
Section: Materials and Energy Conservation Potential Of Worldwide Indimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although it has been shown that millions of people are engaged in INDIY ICT M&R activities around the world [22], it remains unclear whether sufficient scale is achieved to impart genuine material and energy savings. There is anecdotal evidence from Apple, the largest OEM by revenue, that third-party repair has slowed sales of iPhones, one of its flagship products [3].…”
Section: Materials and Energy Conservation Potential Of Worldwide Indimentioning
Repair of computing devices is a potentially valuable pathway to energy and material conservation. I examine current barriers and enablers in design, manufacturing, policy, and practice arenas to more efficacious and widely deployed networks of third-party repair by 2030. Current barriers include design practices that reduce device service life; manufacturing practices that fail to mitigate or eliminate toxicants and externalities (e.g., pollution, waste), the socialization of costs of harms (e.g., pollution, waste) and the privatization of profits from device sales; restrictive enduser licensing agreements (EULAs), and the criminalization of third-party repair. Current enablers include public advocacy for legislation and regulation that reduce or eliminate toxicants in electronics design and manufacturing, require manufacturers to disclose pollution releases and transfers, and enhance right-torepair; and growing networks of independent and do-it-yourself ICT maintenance and repair (INDIY ICT M&R) practitioners and advocates. After examining these barriers to, and enablers of, more efficacious and widely deployed third-party repair, I draw together findings from our existing research on INDIY ICT M&R activity and its potential to contribute to material and energy conservation for computing within limits over the next decade.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.