2004
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planet Formation by Coagulation: A Focus on Uranus and Neptune

Abstract: ■ Abstract Planets form in the circumstellar disks of young stars. We review the basic physical processes by which solid bodies accrete each other and alter each others' random velocities, and we provide order-of-magnitude derivations for the rates of these processes. We discuss and exercise the two-groups approximation, a simple yet powerful technique for solving the evolution equations for protoplanet growth. We describe orderly, runaway, neutral, and oligarchic growth. We also delineate the conditions under… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
375
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
8
375
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Goldreich et al (2004) already pointed out that the presence of a large amount of small planetesimals would help to accelerate planetary formation. If the planetesimal disk is dominated by big bodies, the time-scale to form solid embryos able to bind a significant envelope and start the gaseous runaway accretion would be too long to complete the formation in less than 10 Myr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldreich et al (2004) already pointed out that the presence of a large amount of small planetesimals would help to accelerate planetary formation. If the planetesimal disk is dominated by big bodies, the time-scale to form solid embryos able to bind a significant envelope and start the gaseous runaway accretion would be too long to complete the formation in less than 10 Myr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 shows the evolution of the RMS eccentricity of stars in the stellar disk, using a similar setup as used by Alexander et al (2007) 2.2 Multi-mass components and mass segregation Stellar scattering had also been considered for multi-mass stellar populations in the dispersion dominated regime . In this regime, for two mass populations, Goldreich et al (2004) suggest that the treatment of the problem only depends on the amplitude of the velocity dispersion (σ2) of the lighter objects, with mass M2, compared with the Hill velocity of the more massive components , with mass M1. The Hill velocity for the more massive stars is defined as…”
Section: Relaxation and Single-star Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the shear dominated regime, not discussed here, it is necessary to take into account the tidal gravity of the central black hole. When the velocity dispersion of the low-mass stars satisfies vesc,1 > σ2 > vH,1, with vesc,1 the escape velocity from massive stars, the exchange of momentum between the heavier and lighter bodies occurs through collisionless gravitational deflections, where gravitational focusing is important (Goldreich et al 2004).…”
Section: Relaxation and Single-star Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fragments can be kept dynamically cold, e.g., by mutual collisions or by gas drag. The accretion then takes place at low v a -the shear-dominated regime -which is very favorable for growth (Goldreich et al 2004). The generation of large amounts of fragments therefore can significantly boost accretion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%