2002
DOI: 10.1112/s0024609302001200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PLANE WITH $A_{\infty}$ -WEIGHTED METRIC NOT BILIPSCHITZ EMBEDDABLE TO ${\bb R}^n$

Abstract: A planar set G ⊂ R 2 is constructed that is bilipschitz equivalent to (G, d z ), where (G, d) is not bilipschitz embeddable to any uniformly convex Banach space. Here, z ∈ (0, 1) and d z denotes the zth power of the metric d. This proves the existence of a strong A ∞ weight in R 2 , such that the corresponding deformed geometry admits no bilipschitz mappings to any uniformly convex Banach space. Such a weight cannot be comparable to the Jacobian of a quasiconformal self-mapping of R 2 .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This refines Bourgain's embedding theorem [5], and improves upon previous embeddings of doubling metrics [14]. It is tight for λ X = O(1) [21,22,14], and λ X = n Ω(1) [27]. The question of whether this bound is tight up to a constant factor for the range λ X ∈ {c 1 , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This refines Bourgain's embedding theorem [5], and improves upon previous embeddings of doubling metrics [14]. It is tight for λ X = O(1) [21,22,14], and λ X = n Ω(1) [27]. The question of whether this bound is tight up to a constant factor for the range λ X ∈ {c 1 , .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We will here concentrate on QC and QS maps. Concerning the existence of bi-Lipschitz parametrizations, we only briefly note that interesting sufficient conditions and counterexamples have been found both in the 2-dimensional ( [13], [22], [38], [44], [52], [53]) and higherdimensional cases ( [4], [28], [30], [32], [50]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also prove that the distance functions of certain fractal subsets of R n give rise to isotropic doubling weights (Proposition 3.6). By virtue of this result, the sets constructed by Semmes [18] and Laakso [16] provide examples of isotropic doubling weights that are not comparable to Df for any δ-monotone, or even quasiconformal, mapping f : R n → R n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x ∈ R n (1.3) 1 12C 3 I n−1 µ(x) ≤ Df µ (x) ≤ πI n−1 µ(x), where C is the doubling constant of µ. Theorem 1.1 expands the class of weights that are known to be comparable to Jacobians of quasiconformal mappings. The quasiconformal Jacobian problem posed by David and Semmes in [9] asks for a characterization of all such weights (see also [4,6,7,16,18]). The authors of [6] point out that such a characterization would give a good idea of which metric spaces are bi-Lipschitz equivalent to R n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%