2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/aac63b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plane sets invisible in finitely many directions

Abstract: We consider the problem of mirror invisibility for plane sets. Given a circle and a finite number of unit vectors (defining the directions of invisibility) such that the angles between them are commensurable with π, for any ε > 0 there exists a set invisible in the chosen directions that contains the circle and is contained in its ε-neighborhood. This set is the disjoint union of infinitely many domains with piecewise smooth boundary. Mathematics subject classifications: 49Q10, 49K30

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this, using (10) and utilizing the double angle formulas for sine and cosine, one obtains the estimate…”
Section: Proofs Of the Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this, using (10) and utilizing the double angle formulas for sine and cosine, one obtains the estimate…”
Section: Proofs Of the Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist and are described (connected) bodies invisible from one point [3,4] and (infinitely connected) bodies invisible from two points [5]. There exist (connected and even simply connected) bodies invisible in one direction (that is, from an infinitely distant point) [6], (finitely connected) bodies invisible in two directions [7], as well as (infinitely connected) bodies invisible in three [8] and (in the two-dimensional case) in n-directions, where the number n ∈ N of directions is arbitrary [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterwards without loss of generality we assume that j α (S) lies in the regular part of the set M and deduce that S is analytic, as in the above case. Corollary 20. Fix a boundary point x ∈ ∂W and a path ψ ⊂ W going to x such that for every j one has A j (y) = A j (x) for y ∈ ψ arbitrarily close to x.…”
Section: Proposition 513mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem for nonconvex bodies is by now well understood [7,8,15,1,17,18]. Generalizations of the problem to the case of rotating bodies have been studied [12,13,22,23], and connections with the phenomena of invisibility, retro-reflection, and Magnus effect in geometric optics and mechanics have been established [21,19,24,2,14,22]. The methods of billiards, Kakeya needle problem, optimal mass transport have been used in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%