2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plane Separation: A method to solve dynamic multi-objective optimization problems with incorporated preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of multiobjective planning was solved by linear weighted transformation. Through the multiple search algorithm, it is found that the best results are obtained at 7 : 2 : 1 by using plane separation [12]. Based on the allocation of the supply selection status for that week, the supply efficiency is calculated using the total supply forecast table as follows in (10).…”
Section: Results Of Multiobjective Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of multiobjective planning was solved by linear weighted transformation. Through the multiple search algorithm, it is found that the best results are obtained at 7 : 2 : 1 by using plane separation [12]. Based on the allocation of the supply selection status for that week, the supply efficiency is calculated using the total supply forecast table as follows in (10).…”
Section: Results Of Multiobjective Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macias-Escobar et al [94] propose the plane separation (PS) method that can incorporate preferences in the optimization process by splitting the population into multiple planes based on the proximity of the solutions to a region of interest (ROI). PS uses the planes to focus on the search towards the ROI while maintaining the diversity in the solutions set to avoid stagnation in local optima.…”
Section: Endogenous-exogenous Hybrid Dmoeasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It remains unclear what the maximum capability knee points can provide if the (approximately) true knee points are correctly identiied. In addition, only a few studies [107,115] have investigated preference incorporation in EDMO to ease decision making challenges [55]. This research direction can be further studied.…”
Section: Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%