“…Even though this procedure is not very accurate, the results thus obtained are satisfactory for our purposes, i.e., kg from Figures 5a, b, c, d are found to be 519, 490, 515, and 523 nm (note that the thicker film (d), deposited under high vacuum, requires a larger absorbance scale and that it yields an undulation due to light interference patterns). By using eq 1, the Eg's calculated are 2.39,2.53,2.41, and 2.37 eV, which can be compared to the reported value of 2.42 eV (16,19). In order to obtain more accurate values of Eg, the nature of the optical transitions in the SC (i.e., direct or indirect) would need to be elucidated by calculating the functions (ahv )m, (a/tv)2and (ahv)2/3 where a = absorption coefficient, and plotting them versus hv for each data point (23,35); however, this procedure requires as input the a values, which, in turn, require knowledge of the thickness of each film deposited.…”