The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-2017-113
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar Seismic Source Characterization Models Developed for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of Istanbul

Abstract: This contribution provides an updated planar seismic source characterization (SSC) model to be used in the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) for Istanbul. It defines planar rupture systems for the four main segments of the North Anatolian fault zone (NAFZ) that are critical for the PSHA of Istanbul: segments covering the rupture zones of the 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce earthquakes, central Marmara, and Ganos/Saros segments. In each rupture system, the source geometry is defined in terms of fault length… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,[51][52][53][54] Furthermore, recent GMMs constrained with data from the region 55 we investigate in this study to reveal a great similitude to NGA-W2 GMMs, for magnitudes close to M w 7. With respect to the geometry of the fault, we use reported fault traces in the Marmara region, 56 to constrain the fault plane as shown in the yellow line in Figure 6.…”
Section: Description Of the Earthquake Source Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[51][52][53][54] Furthermore, recent GMMs constrained with data from the region 55 we investigate in this study to reveal a great similitude to NGA-W2 GMMs, for magnitudes close to M w 7. With respect to the geometry of the fault, we use reported fault traces in the Marmara region, 56 to constrain the fault plane as shown in the yellow line in Figure 6.…”
Section: Description Of the Earthquake Source Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%