2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4790139
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar Hall resistance ring sensor based on NiFe/Cu/IrMn trilayer structure

Abstract: International audienceWe have investigated the sensitivity of a planar Hall resistance sensor as a function of the ring radius in the trilayer structure Ta(3)/IrMn(10)/Cu(0.2)/NiFe(10)/Ta(3) (nm). The diagonal components of magnetoresistivity tensor in rectangular prism corresponding to anisotropic magnetoresistance are few ten times larger than that of off-diagonal component corresponding to planar Hall resistance. However, it is noteworthy that the resultant contribution is governed by the off-diagonal compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar trilayer stack was later used in multi-ring planar Hall effect bridge sensors. 25 The maximum signal that can be obtained from a sensor constructed from a given stack depends not only on the low-field sensitivity of the sensor but also on the maximum applicable sensor bias current. Thus, it is not a priori clear whether the optimum magnetic stack for magnetic field detection is also the best stack for detection of magnetic beads using the sensor self-field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar trilayer stack was later used in multi-ring planar Hall effect bridge sensors. 25 The maximum signal that can be obtained from a sensor constructed from a given stack depends not only on the low-field sensitivity of the sensor but also on the maximum applicable sensor bias current. Thus, it is not a priori clear whether the optimum magnetic stack for magnetic field detection is also the best stack for detection of magnetic beads using the sensor self-field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) of p= ffiffi ffi 2 p instead of the claimed ffiffi ffi 2 p . However, we do not agree on the signal calculation for a ring sensor derived by Sinha et al 1 We are able to follow the derivation of the sensor signal until their Eq. (4), which for a general Wheatstone bridge should read…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some sensors also included a thin copper layer between the FM and AFM layers to weaken the exchange bias coupling. 7 Upon application of a magnetic field B y along the y-direction, the equivalent single domain magnetization angle h 6 for a sensor branch can be obtained by minimizing the energy density, u. The energy density normalized with the saturation magnetization M s of the ferromagnetic layer is…”
Section: Magnetic Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Also, the use of PHEB sensors for both volume-and surface-based biodetection schemes using only the field from the sensor bias current as magnetic field excitation has been demonstrated. [17][18][19] While these PHEB sensors showed improved signal-tonoise ratio, both ring shaped sensors with curved resistors ("ring sensors") 7,15 and diamond shaped sensors with straight resistors ("diamond sensors") 14,20 have been argued to be the superior design. The pros and cons of ring and diamond sensors were recently discussed theoretically for the detection of external magnetic fields and a theoretical analysis predicted the diamond sensors to be 41% more sensitive than the corresponding ring sensors for the same bias current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation