Plan S: Overlooked hybrid journal model

Shrier, Ian; Schmid, Christopher H.

doi:10.1126/science.aav7335

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hybrid journals played an essential role in the "scientific ecosystem" allowing authors to publish in "top journals" (Shrier & Schmid, 2019, p. 461;Milne, 2019). Eliminating the hybrid journal model could restrict a researcher's choice to publish in journals that were appropriate for their scientific discoveries (Shrier & Schmid, 2019;Milne, 2019). Nevertheless, Plan S pushed back, aiming to achieve their goals in 2021 instead of 2020 (cOAlition S, 2019).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges

Pilato

Tran

2020

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges

Pilato

Tran

2020

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, open access payment is the authors’ responsibility. While most research grants cover page charges, there is no supplementary financing for open access charges, and authors must therefore choose between paying for open access and consumables for their research (14 ). In the long run, if open access is to be prioritized, current CAPES funding for subscriptions should somehow be diverted to cover open access publication costs.…”

Section: Academic Publications: Pre-prints and Subscription Vs Open Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Where do we aspire to publish? A position paper on scientific communication in biochemistry and molecular biology

Baptista

Alves

Arantes

et al. 2019

Braz J Med Biol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scientific publication landscape is changing quickly, with an enormous increase in options and models. Articles can be published in a complex variety of journals that differ in their presentation format (online-only or in-print), editorial organizations that maintain them (commercial and/or society-based), editorial handling (academic or professional editors), editorial board composition (academic or professional), payment options to cover editorial costs (open access or pay-to-read), indexation, visibility, branding, and other aspects. Additionally, online submissions of non-revised versions of manuscripts prior to seeking publication in a peer-reviewed journal (a practice known as pre-printing) are a growing trend in biological sciences. In this changing landscape, researchers in biochemistry and molecular biology must re-think their priorities in terms of scientific output dissemination. The evaluation processes and institutional funding for scientific publications should also be revised accordingly. This article presents the results of discussions within the Department of Biochemistry, University of São Paulo, on this subject.

show abstract

“…[4] Conventionally, blood samples are used to monitor the immune response including the circulating immune cells and antibodies. Immune studies in tissues such as tumor, [9][10][11] joints with rheumatoid arthritis, [12,13] adipose tissue [14][15][16][17] and lung, [18][19][20] offered a wealth of information on the disease progression and metastasis and led to development of therapies. However, tissue samples offer only snapshots of immune status at a certain point of time and the current challenge is to follow the immune response to infection, immunebased therapies, and vaccination in tissues which would provide valuable information on these effects.…”

Section: Introduction 1immune Responses: Innate and Adaptive Immunitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Immunity‐on‐a‐Chip: Integration of Immune Components into the Scheme of Organ‐on‐a‐Chip Systems

Ramadan

Hazaymeh²,

Zourob

2023

Advanced Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studying the immune system in vitro aims to understand how, when, and where the immune cells migrate/differentiate and respond to the various triggering events and the decision points along the immune response journey. It becomes evident that organ‐on‐a‐chip (OOC) technology has a superior capability to recapitulate the cell‐cell and tissue‐tissue interaction in the body, with a great potential to provide tools for tracking the paracrine signaling with high spatial‐temporal precision and implementing in situ real‐time, non‐destructive detection assays, therefore, enabling extraction of mechanistic information rather than phenotypic information. However, despite the rapid development in this technology, integration of the immune system into OOC devices stays among the least navigated tasks, with immune cells still the major missing components in the developed models. This is mainly due to the complexity of the immune system and the reductionist methodology of the OOC modules. Dedicated research in this field is demanded to establish the understanding of mechanism‐based disease endotypes rather than phenotypes. Herein, we systemically present a synthesis of the state‐of‐the‐art of immune‐cantered OOC technology. We comprehensively outlined what is achieved and identified the technology gaps emphasizing the missing components required to establish immune‐competent OOCs and bridge these gaps.

show abstract

Plan S: Overlooked hybrid journal model

Cited by 6 publications

References 2 publications

Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges

Stony Brook University Author Perspectives on Article Processing Charges

Where do we aspire to publish? A position paper on scientific communication in biochemistry and molecular biology

Immunity‐on‐a‐Chip: Integration of Immune Components into the Scheme of Organ‐on‐a‐Chip Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About