Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1007/s003309900306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plain film, CT and MRI sensibility in the evaluation of intraorbital foreign bodies in an in vitro model of the orbit and in pig eyes

Abstract: Detection and characterization of intraorbital foreign bodies (IFB) is fundamental in acute trauma setting, preventing inflammatory sequelae or complications related to IFB movements when a MRI study is planned. Papers concerning plain film and CT sensibility in IFB detection show controversial results. For this reason we investigated plain film, CT and MRI sensibility in the evaluation of IFB. For an in vitro model, specimens of dry and fresh wood, glass, iron, plastic and graphite were immersed in animal lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Plain X-ray does not work for viewing IOWFB because it is hard to visualize wood with this modality. [10,11] USG has a very limited role as it requires expertise and is not reliable for imaging the orbital apex. [10,12] Moreover, it can image the proximity of the orbital cavity in the absence of orbital imaging.…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plain X-ray does not work for viewing IOWFB because it is hard to visualize wood with this modality. [10,11] USG has a very limited role as it requires expertise and is not reliable for imaging the orbital apex. [10,12] Moreover, it can image the proximity of the orbital cavity in the absence of orbital imaging.…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, choosing the appropriate imaging modality to trace a foreign-body depends on its location, size, physical properties and adjacent structures (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The general consensus throughout the literature is that the most effective means of evaluating the presence of soft tissue foreign bodies is through the use of CT scanning. 4,7,8 Moreover, the use of ultrasound biomicroscopy has also been found by several investigators to be significantly better in identifying intraocular foreign bodies compared with X-ray. [9][10][11] In fact, ultrasound has even been reported to detect intraocular foreign bodies in several instances when CT scanning failed to do so.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%