Physiology of Movements / Physiologie Der Bewegungen 1962
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-94852-7_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plagio- und Diageotropismus der Sprosse und Blätter, einschließlich Epinastie, Hyponastie, Entfaltungsbewegungen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This direction is based on the position of the flower in the ramification system and thus on flower initiation and early development, and, even more, in final adjustments of the position before and during anthesis. Mechanisms for such late adjustment are bending or torsion of pedicels and peduncles, as shown for Aconitum, Antirrhinum, Scrophularia and Viola by Noll (1888) and later also for many other plants (Cornehls, 1927;Zimmermann, 1933;Kaldewey, 1962;Huang et al, 2002). In this way monosymmetric flowers can be adjusted to a horizontal position with the symmetry plane perpendicular to the ground.…”
Section: Diverse Manifestations Of Monosymmetry In Flowersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This direction is based on the position of the flower in the ramification system and thus on flower initiation and early development, and, even more, in final adjustments of the position before and during anthesis. Mechanisms for such late adjustment are bending or torsion of pedicels and peduncles, as shown for Aconitum, Antirrhinum, Scrophularia and Viola by Noll (1888) and later also for many other plants (Cornehls, 1927;Zimmermann, 1933;Kaldewey, 1962;Huang et al, 2002). In this way monosymmetric flowers can be adjusted to a horizontal position with the symmetry plane perpendicular to the ground.…”
Section: Diverse Manifestations Of Monosymmetry In Flowersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, it has been proposed (Lundegardh 1917;Rufelt 1962) that diagravitropism and plagiogravitropism might be the result of the balance between the forces of negative and positive gravitropism, which implies that negative and positive orthogravitropism are themselves distinct processes. It has also been proposed that diagravitropism and plagiogravitropism might be due to a balance between negative gravitropism and epinasty (Kaldewey 1962;Palmer 1985). In other words, the fact that different categories have been proposed, into which various types of gravitropic responses can be grouped (positive ortho-, negative ortho-, plagio-and diagravitropism), seems to have encouraged the view that the different classes of gravitropism might have different underlying control mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in the original definition of epinasty (de Vries, 1872), epinastic movement was suggested to be autonomous, the influence of external factors has never been challenged (see, e.g. the textbook by Rawitscher, 1932 or the review of Kaldewey, 1962).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%