“…Many papers identified and subsequently excluded, contained views based on previous studies or arrived at new insights, made new arguments, or constructed models by reinterpreting previous primary studies (Austin & Brown, 1999;Flowerdew & Li, 2007; M. Hart & Friesner, 2004;Howard, 1995;McCabe et al, 2001;Valentine, 2006;Whitley, 1998). Papers were also found to make arguments, recommend some action, or define new methods to deal with plagiarism based on anecdotal, personal or institutional experience (Bachore, 2015;Briggs, 2003;Conradson & Hernández-Ramos, 2004;Gerhardt, 2006;Harris, 2002;Howell et al, 2009;Kiehl, 2006;McCabe & Stephens, 2006;McDowell & Brown, 2001;Rowe, 2004;Scanlan, 2006;Thomas & Sassi, 2011;Vaka'uta, 2008). Once a paper was found to be based on primary data the fourth criterion was applied.…”