2020
DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2020.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placing poverty-inequality at the centre of psychiatry

Abstract: We examine epidemiological evidence for the central role of inequalities (principally economic) in driving the onset of mental disorders, physical ill health and premature mortality. We locate the search for solutions in current UK contexts, and include known and likely effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Prevention of mental disorders and adverse outcomes such as premature mortality must begin with efforts to mitigate rising poverty-inequality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we accept the proposed notion of a casual association between inequality and mental health, several important implications emerge from our findings. Most fundamentally, they suggest that rising levels of inequality may drive increases in the incidence of mental health disorders, and arguably as a consequence, that inequality (alongside poverty and other environmental factors) should be placed at the centre of psychiatry and applied psychology [ 5 ]. For example, national guidelines for Early Intervention Psychosis services in the UK [ 119 ] state that commissioning “should be underpinned by estimated local incidence of psychosis, derived to incorporate a range of demographic features such as ethnicity, age, population density and deprivation” (p. 6), and to this we would add inequality as a further important factor for consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we accept the proposed notion of a casual association between inequality and mental health, several important implications emerge from our findings. Most fundamentally, they suggest that rising levels of inequality may drive increases in the incidence of mental health disorders, and arguably as a consequence, that inequality (alongside poverty and other environmental factors) should be placed at the centre of psychiatry and applied psychology [ 5 ]. For example, national guidelines for Early Intervention Psychosis services in the UK [ 119 ] state that commissioning “should be underpinned by estimated local incidence of psychosis, derived to incorporate a range of demographic features such as ethnicity, age, population density and deprivation” (p. 6), and to this we would add inequality as a further important factor for consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst this has led to calls for greater investment in psychological therapies [2], of which the UK's improving access to psychological therapies (IAPT) scheme is a prime example [3], such an approach, which (arguably) locates the problem as well as the solution in the individual, has had its detractors. Thus, many have proposed that such an approach fails to take into consideration the socioeconomic contexts in which mental illness, and distress more generally, occurs, and consequently, removes the onus on governments for broader social and economic reform [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrying this knowledge has allowed psychiatrists to make bold observations on the very real impact of social inequality on people's mental health. 48 This ability to understand how influenced people are by their environments is also why psychiatrists should see the growing threat to nature as entwined with climate change and ultimately with mental and physical well-being for everyone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worst of his experiences were outside health services, and he set me on a path of learning about poverty and inequality. 36 Effective community mental health services require an understanding of the communities we serve. This goes beyond cultural and subcultural beliefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%