Places of Privileged Consumption Practices: Spatial Capital, the Dot–Com Habitus, and San Francisco's Internet Boom

Abstract

Drawing from interviews and fieldwork with former dot‐com workers in San Francisco, this article examines how their spatialized consumption practices formed exclusionary places of privilege during the city's millennial boom of internet companies. I focus especially on the personalized deployment of uneven social power in situations where space is at stake. After considering how this group differed from a history of other urban newcomers, I develop a framework for addressing their spatial effects as gentrification involving privileged consumption practices that surpass residential encroachments. I argue there is an exertion of spatial capital that represents the misrecognition of territorial claims, enabling this cohort to literally take place. I show this through several consumption practices that convert to and from economic, cultural, and social capital. A concluding discussion reflects on the usefulness of this case and framework for reinvigorating key urban‐sociological analytics while confronting influential but unsociological characterizations of contemporary city life.

An Ecological Exploration of Generation Y: Residence Location Choice in the San Francisco Bay Area

“…Even with Millennials' aptitude with communication technologies that reduce the need for geographic propinquity (Rainer and Rainer 2011;Burstein 2013), the clustering of older Millennials in urban and central locations in the Bay Area suggests that "place" remains important. The fact that San Francisco, one of the most diverse and cosmopolitan cities in the U.S. (Florida 2002;Centner 2008) features-by a wide margin-the largest proportion of upper quintile tracts in the entire study area is unlikely to be a coincidence.…”

Spatial capital as a tool for planning practice

“…This leads him to conclude that by taking a long historical picture of the whole city it is possible to trace shifts in the scale at which spatial distinction has occurred. In parallel to the study by Centner (2008), he focuses, in particular, on how spatial distinction comes to be seen as natural.…”

“…People with a particular disposition (habitus) and capitals are likely to be successful across a series of fields including through the interplay of fixity and mobility. Drawing on the earlier examples, groups are at liberty to take possession of parts of the city (Centner 2008). Households are able to 'game play' advantageous schooling provision which they do both through fixity and mobility and other offers of the city such as cultural attractions (Rérat & Lees 2011).…”

Desigualdad, desarrollo humano y la consolidación urbano-regional en México

“…También se ha recurrido a la noción de 'capital espacial' para expresar una idea similar acerca de la importancia del espacio geográ co. Sin embargo, estos autores utilizan el concepto de capital espacial de manera contradictoria; por ahora, la idea está sujeta a debate en tanto se de ne si es la unidad territorial o un sujeto quien encarna esta forma de capital (Centner, 2008;Marcus, 2008;Rérat & Lees, 2011).…”