A Companion to Social Archaeology 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470693605.part3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Places

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I see the design, construction and use of these contexts as acts of placemaking. This implies a distinction between space and place, something now widely accepted across the social sciences (Feld and Basso 1996;Low and Lawrence-Zúñiga 2003;Preucel and Meskell 2004;Tuan 1977). While space generally refers to the static, physical setting in which everything occurs, place is the dynamic, socially-constructed and meaningful context of human action and experience.…”
Section: An Integrative Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…I see the design, construction and use of these contexts as acts of placemaking. This implies a distinction between space and place, something now widely accepted across the social sciences (Feld and Basso 1996;Low and Lawrence-Zúñiga 2003;Preucel and Meskell 2004;Tuan 1977). While space generally refers to the static, physical setting in which everything occurs, place is the dynamic, socially-constructed and meaningful context of human action and experience.…”
Section: An Integrative Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They viewed the household as a category that connects social identity with a locale. They also emphasize that cultural memory necessarily oscillates between the physicality of monuments, things, and representations, as well as immaterial practices that locate subjects within a new time–space understanding that fuses the past, present, and future (Preucel & Meskell 2007). Similarly, Giddens (1984), Gosden (2001), Schama (1995), Tilley (1994) and others link historical memory to the social and cultural construction of space.…”
Section: Theory and Themesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Border territories on the margins of civilizations that advance cultural uniformity and iconography, as Preucel and Meskell (2004: 220-1) point out, can be regions of considerable ambiguity and intersection. In the border territories of Olmec civilization, Wilk (2004: 86, 94) has tried to tackle contradictions in the material culture that on the one hand can show cultural uniformity, and on the other, difference to dominant Olmec styles.…”
Section: ■ Symbolism Ritual and Mining Communities: Some Cross-cultural Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%