2014
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2013.850108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Places and People: Rhetorical Constructions of “Community” in a Canadian Environmental Risk Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem with this approach, when striving for engagement, is reflected in Spoel and Den Hoed's critique of community engagement when they write "the risk assessment context indicates the continuing presence of authoritative technical-regulatory framings", which relegates "citizen groups to a downstream, reactive response to a phenomenon already problematized, investigated, and mitigated in terms of 'expert' risk constructs" (p.282). 4 Wynne explains that starting with an issue already defined in terms of risk assumes that people are only concerned with "instrumental consequences, and not also crucially about what human purposes are driving science and innovation in the first place" (p.67). 2 The notion of an injury being an 'instrumental consequence' is a simplified and not totally fair assessment of how injury prevention research is carried out, but the critique can be applied to much of what goes on in the field because it is calling out the taken-for-granted beliefs and assumptions of how injury prevention research should be done.…”
Section: Prefigured Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem with this approach, when striving for engagement, is reflected in Spoel and Den Hoed's critique of community engagement when they write "the risk assessment context indicates the continuing presence of authoritative technical-regulatory framings", which relegates "citizen groups to a downstream, reactive response to a phenomenon already problematized, investigated, and mitigated in terms of 'expert' risk constructs" (p.282). 4 Wynne explains that starting with an issue already defined in terms of risk assumes that people are only concerned with "instrumental consequences, and not also crucially about what human purposes are driving science and innovation in the first place" (p.67). 2 The notion of an injury being an 'instrumental consequence' is a simplified and not totally fair assessment of how injury prevention research is carried out, but the critique can be applied to much of what goes on in the field because it is calling out the taken-for-granted beliefs and assumptions of how injury prevention research should be done.…”
Section: Prefigured Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And by extension, because communities collaboratively construct places, talk about settings can reveal nuances in community conflict and cooperation. Spoel and Den Hoed (2014), for example, found contrasting visions of Northern Ontario (paradise vs. contamination) in the rhetoric of groups competing over proper responses to mining. In this study I assume a similar perspective, presuming that the purposeful use of language can reveal unspoken assumptions about the nature and value of place and indicate how those assumptions empower or impede social action.…”
Section: Speaking Of Placementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to chart the image clusters of descriptive words and phrases used within and across our participants' accounts is to provide insight into the complex, dynamic ways in which they understand "verification" as an integral aspect of their professional practices and identities (Gulbrandsen, 2010;Spoel & Den Hoed, 2014). As Burke (1957) …”
Section: Data Collection and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%