2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placental pathology, birthweight discordance, and growth restriction in twin pregnancy: results of the ESPRiT Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…shows a higher incidence of infarctions, subchorial fibrin deposition, and abnormal villous maturation compared to DC twins (41.5% vs 32.9%; P ¼ .009). 78,79 MC twins present also with a higher incidence of fetal vessels thrombosis compared to DC. 80 Fetal vascular thrombosis is found generally in association with IUGR in MC twins and with hypertensive disorders in DC twins.…”
Section: Obstetrics Expert Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…shows a higher incidence of infarctions, subchorial fibrin deposition, and abnormal villous maturation compared to DC twins (41.5% vs 32.9%; P ¼ .009). 78,79 MC twins present also with a higher incidence of fetal vessels thrombosis compared to DC. 80 Fetal vascular thrombosis is found generally in association with IUGR in MC twins and with hypertensive disorders in DC twins.…”
Section: Obstetrics Expert Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, these effects vary between populations [20,21]. It has been reported that placental factors alone contribute to neonatal growth retardation in 36% of LBW cases [12,22]. Placental factors include changes in placental morphology and insults to the placenta such as infarcts, chronic villous inflammation, and vascular vessel thrombosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study indicated a correlation between placental abnormalities with birth weight discrepancy and intrauterine growth restriction in dichorionic twins. On the other hand, no such association was observed in monochorionic twin pregnancies [9].…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In retrospective studies the threshold range from 10 to 30% [4,5,9,[19][20][21][22][23][24] (Table 1). According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [27] an EFW disparity of approximately 15-25% is considered to be clinically significant, whereas the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines [28] set the threshold at the level of 25% and recommend the referral of such pregnancies to a tertiary fetal medicine center.…”
Section: Estimated Fetal Weight Discordance and Perinatal Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation