2020
DOI: 10.37897/rjmp.2020.1.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placental fusion in a dichorionic-diamniotic IVF twin pregnancy – case presentation

Abstract: Twin pregnancies have an increased incidence in recent years, especially due to the development of assisted human reproduction techniques. Although most of the in vitro fertilization pregnancies are dichorionic tasks, exceptions may also occur following the placental fusion process. Twin pregnancies in which the fusion process occurs associate the complications of monochorial pregnancies such as prematurity, growth discordance between the twins, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, twin reversed arterial perfusi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reverse misdiagnoses of DC as MC pregnancies prior to 14 weeks of gestation are also encountered in medical practice [21]. In our study, as much as 10% of pregnancies (4 cases) were misdiagnosed during the early ultrasound scan as high-risk MC gestations, but were found to be DZ by DNA testing, which may be explained as a result of fusion of DZ placentas [22]. These four misdiagnoses were made at two different obstetric units in Gdańsk by different physicians dedicated to obstetric ultrasound and with the use of different equipment, which excludes systematic error of one examiner as explanation of the observed discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Reverse misdiagnoses of DC as MC pregnancies prior to 14 weeks of gestation are also encountered in medical practice [21]. In our study, as much as 10% of pregnancies (4 cases) were misdiagnosed during the early ultrasound scan as high-risk MC gestations, but were found to be DZ by DNA testing, which may be explained as a result of fusion of DZ placentas [22]. These four misdiagnoses were made at two different obstetric units in Gdańsk by different physicians dedicated to obstetric ultrasound and with the use of different equipment, which excludes systematic error of one examiner as explanation of the observed discrepancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%