1979
DOI: 10.1148/131.2.465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placenta Praevia: Significance in the Second Trimester

Abstract: A prospective study was performed on 98 patients to determine the risk of a second trimester placenta praevia remaining until term. The presence and degree of anterior or posterior praevia were scored for each patient. Follow-up data were obtained at delivery on 58 patients. A greater fraction (63.8%) of second trimester praevia was implanted posteriorly. The overall incidence of a second trimester praevia persisting until term was 8.8%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis of placenta accreta, increta, or percreta during the pregnancy prior to labor helps prevent an unexpected emergency situation during delivery and thereby decreases the risk to the mother. US, including color Doppler sonography, can establish the diagnosis in most cases, with MR imaging When two-dimensional static US was introduced, it became the method of choice for assessing placental location and for diagnosing placenta previa (115) and monitoring placental migration during pregnancy (116,117). Migration away from the cervix is common except when the previa is central (117).…”
Section: Fetal Anomaly Detection and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of placenta accreta, increta, or percreta during the pregnancy prior to labor helps prevent an unexpected emergency situation during delivery and thereby decreases the risk to the mother. US, including color Doppler sonography, can establish the diagnosis in most cases, with MR imaging When two-dimensional static US was introduced, it became the method of choice for assessing placental location and for diagnosing placenta previa (115) and monitoring placental migration during pregnancy (116,117). Migration away from the cervix is common except when the previa is central (117).…”
Section: Fetal Anomaly Detection and Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placental migration has been proposed as a possible mechanism for the resolving of placenta previa. Placental migration is generally attributed to uterine growth: during the second trimester, the cervix incorporates into the lower uterine segment; in the third trimester, effacement of the cervix causes the elongation of the lower uterine segment, which results in the enlargement of the uterus in an opposite direction from the cervical os; finally, the low‐lying placenta is seen to move away from the cervical os . In other previous studies, the development of placenta is linked with dynamic vascular changes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The incidence of placenta previa described in the literature is extremely variable and oscillates in accordance with gestational age at the time of examination and method of diagnosis. In the second trimester it varies from 1.1% when a transvaginal approach is used to 31.3% with transabdominal ultrasound 15 . In the third trimester the incidence varies from 0.8% to 2.7% by transvaginal ultrasound scan [15][16][17] and at term these values reach between 0.2% and 1.2% 5,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%