2022
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.862785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Among Multiple Gestation: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Chinese Population

Abstract: BackgroundIt remained controversial whether women with multiple gestation are at higher risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and large-scale studies are needed. This study aimed to assess whether PAS incidence is higher among women with multiple gestation than among singleton, as well as to compare the characteristics and outcomes of PAS in multiple and singleton gestation.MethodsWomen who underwent cesarean section with live births at Peking University First Hospital from January 2015 to December… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Continuous outcomes (hospital LOS and adjusted cost) were dichotomized by setting the cutoff value as a rounded number near the 75th percentile. 44 For each outcome measure, we first applied a predefined adjustment model [45][46][47] to assess the adjusted association of placenta previa with the risk of PAS outcomes. The following factors were included along with placenta previa in the predefined model: age, year, race and ethnicity, obesity status, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, PAS severity, previous cesarean delivery, multiparity, gestational weeks, the use of assisted reproductive technology, multiple gestation, hospital bed size, and hospital teaching status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Continuous outcomes (hospital LOS and adjusted cost) were dichotomized by setting the cutoff value as a rounded number near the 75th percentile. 44 For each outcome measure, we first applied a predefined adjustment model [45][46][47] to assess the adjusted association of placenta previa with the risk of PAS outcomes. The following factors were included along with placenta previa in the predefined model: age, year, race and ethnicity, obesity status, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, PAS severity, previous cesarean delivery, multiparity, gestational weeks, the use of assisted reproductive technology, multiple gestation, hospital bed size, and hospital teaching status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%